Monopolar polarization of crystals

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Stanley514
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Crystals Polarization
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of monopolar polarization in highly asymmetric crystals, as introduced in the article from Physical Review B. The author challenges the traditional view that polarization is solely dipolar, highlighting that monopole polarization can exist due to the arrangement of point charges and dipoles within the crystal's elementary cell. This model accounts for indirect interactions among point charges through a polarized lattice, which does not contradict the multipole expansion theory when considering multiple points within a single cell.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of crystal polarization concepts
  • Familiarity with multipole expansion theory
  • Knowledge of point charge and dipole interactions
  • Basic principles of solid-state physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of monopolar polarization in solid-state physics
  • Study the multipole expansion in the context of crystal structures
  • Explore the role of polarized lattices in charge interactions
  • Examine case studies of asymmetric crystals exhibiting monopolar characteristics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and researchers interested in advanced crystal polarization phenomena and the theoretical frameworks surrounding solid-state interactions.

Stanley514
Messages
404
Reaction score
2
This one article mention such strange issue as monopole polarization
in highly asymmetric crystals.
(I did not read entire article).
I always thought that polarization could be only dipolar because you
need to get charge separation.How monopole thing could exist in a
crystal?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As far as I can tell, he models the elementary cell as an arrangement of both point charges and dipoles, both polarizable. Hence there is also an indirect interaction of the point charges via the polarized lattice. This is not in contradiction with the multipole expansion of an elementary cell not containing a monopole contribution as he does not consider a multipole series around a single point but several points inside one cell.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
881
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
784