Monotonicity of odd function and 1-1 function

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter xsw001
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of odd functions and one-to-one functions, specifically questioning whether odd functions are always strictly monotone and if one-to-one functions must also be strictly monotone. The scope includes theoretical considerations and counterexamples.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants argue that odd functions are not always strictly monotone, providing counterexamples such as a piecewise function that is neither strictly increasing nor decreasing.
  • Another participant cites the function f(x) = sin(x) as a counterexample to the claim that odd functions are strictly monotone.
  • Regarding one-to-one functions, some participants suggest that the statement is false unless continuity is imposed, citing a specific example where a function is one-to-one but not strictly monotone due to discontinuities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the monotonicity of odd functions, as multiple counterexamples are provided. There is also disagreement on the monotonicity of one-to-one functions, particularly in the absence of continuity.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the definitions of odd and one-to-one functions, as well as the conditions of continuity that affect the validity of the claims made.

xsw001
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
I have two general questions that I'm NOT sure if it's absolutely accurate statement or NOT.

1) Odd function is always strictly monotone, either strictly increasing or strictly decreasing right? If there any counterexample to disprove my assumption?

2) One-to-one function is always strictly monotone right? Is there any counterexample to disprove my assumption?

Note: This is NOT homework questions. These are my general assumptions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1) Incorrect.
For example, the function f(-1)=1, f(1)=-1, f(x)=0 otherwise is neither strictly increasing or decreasing.
Making a continuous function of this one, with "humps" around x=-1 and 1 is another simple counter-example.

F(x)=0 is a third counterexample.

2) Correct
 
1) an obvious counterexample is f(x) = sin(x)

2) should be false, if you don't impose that the function has to be continuous

E.g.:
f(x) = x {x != 2,3}
f(2) = 3
f(3) = 2
 
nicksauce said:
2) should be false, if you don't impose that the function has to be continuous

E.g.:
f(x) = x {x != 2,3}
f(2) = 3
f(3) = 2
Oh dear..:shy:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K