Moral America, where do we go from here?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Kerrie
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the ongoing cultural and moral debates in America, highlighting issues such as gay marriage, abortion, stem cell research, and the Pledge of Allegiance. Participants argue about the balance between individual freedoms and moral codes, questioning how laws are shaped by differing beliefs. The conversation emphasizes the need for a common moral framework that respects diverse views while addressing controversial topics. Ultimately, the discussion calls for a reevaluation of how American society navigates these moral dilemmas in light of evolving cultural norms.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of American constitutional principles regarding church and state separation
  • Familiarity with contemporary moral issues such as abortion and gay marriage
  • Knowledge of the historical context of the Pledge of Allegiance
  • Awareness of the implications of scientific advancements on moral debates, particularly in stem cell research and cloning
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the legal history and current status of gay marriage in the U.S.
  • Explore the ethical considerations surrounding stem cell research and cloning technologies
  • Investigate the impact of the Pledge of Allegiance on American identity and its historical changes
  • Examine the role of parental influence in shaping children's understanding of moral issues
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for sociologists, ethicists, policymakers, and educators interested in understanding the complexities of moral issues in contemporary American society.

  • #31


Originally posted by Njorl
Ah. You're probably right. My first thought was natural law=law of the jungle. I now vaguely recall that there is a set of concepts collectively known as natural law. My mistake.

Njorl
You're probably thinking Hobbes: "state of nature," ie anarchy. No biggie.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Originally posted by phatmonky
My amazing awful, horrible, vile, stances...


That 'creationist junk' has as much founding as evolution.

Actually, if you venture into the science forums, you'll see many intelligent threads on exactly why creationism is awful, horrible, and incredibly stupid bull****.

Teaching creationism in science class is like teaching holocaust denial in history class.
 
  • #33
Originally posted by Chemicalsuperfreak
Actually, if you venture into the science forums, you'll see many intelligent threads on exactly why creationism is awful, horrible, and incredibly stupid bull****.

Teaching creationism in science class is like teaching holocaust denial in history class.
Be fair...creationism isn't quite as bad as holocaust denial. However, neither subject deserves serious study in America's schools.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #34
Originally posted by Zero
Right...so when are the Christian right going to quit whining and depending on political correctness to get away with what they do?

Got you rolls reversed here, I think. Political correctness is the whine of the liberal; almost exclusively.
 
  • #35
Originally posted by LURCH
Got you rolls reversed here, I think. Political correctness is the whine of the liberal; almost exclusively.
That is exactly the opposite of true. While the name may not be the same, the official osition of the right-wing seems to be "if you say anything negative about our side, it is hate speech, and should be stopped". Conservatives are the masters of whining, from their lie that religious freedom is at risk from the ACLU, to their lie about "liberal media bias".
 
  • #36
Originally posted by LURCH
Got you rolls reversed here, I think. Political correctness is the whine of the liberal; almost exclusively.

I disagree. Political correctness is what republicans stick to so they don't say something overtly racist, sexist, etc. Not that the occassional freudian slip doesn't get out.
 
  • #37
Originally posted by Zero
Be fair...creationism isn't quite as bad as holocaust denial. However, neither subject deserves serious study in America's schools.

I disagree. The motives are somewhat different (although you'll often find the same people advocating both), if you judge each belief based on fact they're quite comparably from an intellectual standpoint.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 99 ·
4
Replies
99
Views
13K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
11K