Proving Isomorphism and Galois Group Existence in Abstract Algebra Homework

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that a group G is isomorphic to the Galois group of an irreducible polynomial of degree d if it has a subgroup H of index d with a trivial intersection of conjugates. Participants explore the implications of G acting transitively as a permutation group and the relationship between the index of subgroups and the degree of field extensions. There is uncertainty regarding how to demonstrate that the stabilizer of an element has the desired index and how the transitive action relates to the subgroup's properties. The fundamental theorem of Galois theory is suggested as a potential tool for addressing the index and degree connection. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities involved in establishing the required conditions for isomorphism and Galois group existence.
Mystic998
Messages
203
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that G is isomorphic to the Galois group of an irreducible polynomial of degree d iff is has a subgroup H of index d such that \bigcap_{\sigma \in G} \sigma H \sigma^{-1} = {1}.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I know that if G acts transitively as a permutation group on a set (and it does in this case being isomorphic to the Galois group of an irreducible), then the stabilizer of an element has the given property. And since the stabilizer is functionally the same for any root, it really shouldn't matter which one I choose. But I don't know how to show that it's of index d. I've tried counting permutations that fix an element and permutations that don't (should be |G|/d or d respectively, assuming I'm doing this right), but I can't find any obvious way to do so in general since obviously the Galois group can be lots and lots of weird things (all subgroups of a symmetric group of course).

As for the other direction, I think it's probably easy to show that if all the conjugates of a subgroup intersect in the trivial subgroup, then G has to act transitively on some set, and so it can be the Galois group of an irreducible with the same number of roots as the set it's acting on. But again I'm not sure why the index being d implies that it has to act transitively on a set of d elements.

Thanks for any help. Also, I might post some more stuff in this topic if I don't have any luck on some other problems.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you mean to say "such that \bigcap_{\sigma \in G} \sigma H \sigma^{-1} = H"?

For the index bit, can't you invoke the fundamental theorem of Galois theory? Remember the connection between indices of subgroups and degrees of field extensions.
 
Oh, I meant for the intersection to be trivial. I'll think about what you said though.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
541
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K