Other More formal education later in career

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around an individual with extensive experience in engineering, holding a BSc in Physics, an MSc, and a PhD in Electrical Engineering, who is contemplating further education in Physics. Despite a fulfilling career in sensor signal processing and mentoring, there is a desire for more structured learning in Physics, particularly in areas like quantum sensing. The individual considers pursuing a Master's degree but also weighs the benefits of taking classes as a non-degree seeking student, noting that this route offers flexibility and less administrative hassle. The conversation highlights the appeal of formal education for accountability and goal-setting, while also acknowledging the abundance of online resources that make traditional degrees less essential. Ultimately, the discussion reflects on the balance between continued education and personal interests, with an emphasis on the individual's intrinsic motivation to learn.
whoohm
Messages
22
Reaction score
23
I'm curious to get your thoughts and learn if anyone else has a similar path.

I'm 20+ years into my career and have a BSc Physics, MSc and PhD in EE. I always wanted to pursue a PhD in Physics but opportunities and life circumstances took me to EE (which I also really loved). My career in areas of sensor signal processing has been enjoyable overall and I have worked at good companies and even started and exited my own company. I am now back at a company I perviously worked at and have a lot of freedom to choose/create projects, etc. I also get the opportunity to mentor others, which I really enjoy.

I'm seriously interested in pursuing more Physics education. Yes, I can (and do) study on my own, but I also enjoy the structure and achievement of taking a formal course. I also often gain a new perspective from an instructor. I don't really think I need another PhD since I already know how to do research, write, present new work, etc. However, I'm thinking a MS in Physics would be fun. Maybe if there was a research area or lab that I was really interested in I could pursue a PhD in Physics. I certainly have areas of strong interest - quantum sensing, etc.

Has anyone on this forum pursued more formal education after a PhD or after many years in industry? Do you regret spending time on learning vs enjoying another hobby or just relaxing? Not sure why I seem to always want to push against something even when there are no financial reasons. Curious to hear your stories if you have a few minutes.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why get an MS? Why not take classes as a non-degree seeking student?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Why get an MS? Why not take classes as a non-degree seeking student?
That's also a good idea and would give me option to pick anything interesting and not worry about degree requirements. Pursuing the degree does provide some structure and a little extra accountability and more precisely defines a goal. I figure if I have to pay for the courses anyway it is worth getting a degree. Otherwise not a lot different than self study. Of course, there are a lot of resources available online these days (MIT open courses, etc.) that make paying for a degree less attractive. I could just donate some funds to those open programs and enjoy. Obviously thinking out loud here...thanks!
 
If you go the degree route, you need to deal with applications and admissions and the like. With the non-degree route, you just open your checkbook and you're in. Easy as pie.

Nothing stops you from taking the same classes as in the degree program.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
If you go the degree route, you need to deal with applications and admissions and the like. With the non-degree route, you just open your checkbook and you're in. Easy as pie.

Nothing stops you from taking the same classes as in the degree program.
Good points. Less process is attractive at this point in my life. Thanks for the suggestions.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top