More intro abstract algebra problems

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the existence of an inverse element for any nonzero element A in the set Q[√2], defined as {a + b√2 | a, b are rationals}. The user successfully identifies the multiplicative identity as 1 and attempts to find the inverse A-1 such that A × A-1 = 1. The key insight is that the irrationality of √2 is crucial for establishing the uniqueness of the coefficients in the equation ac + 2bd = 1 and ad + cb = 0, ensuring that solutions exist for the inverse.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of abstract algebra concepts, specifically fields and inverses.
  • Familiarity with rational and irrational numbers, particularly √2.
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills, including solving equations with multiple variables.
  • Knowledge of the properties of multiplicative identities in algebraic structures.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of fields in abstract algebra, focusing on the existence of inverses.
  • Explore the concept of rationalizing denominators in algebraic expressions.
  • Learn about the implications of irrational numbers in algebraic structures.
  • Investigate the structure of Q[√d] for various irrational numbers d.
USEFUL FOR

Students of abstract algebra, particularly those studying field theory, as well as educators and tutors looking to enhance their understanding of algebraic structures involving irrational numbers.

stripes
Messages
262
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Define the set Q[√2] to be the set {a + b√2 | a, b are rationals}, and define addition and multiplication as "usual" (so 2×4 = 8, 2 + 4 = 6, you know, the usual). Show that for any nonzero A in the set Q[√2], there exists an inverse element so that A×A-1 = 1Q[√2].

There is a hint saying that I'll need the fact that √2 is irrational. He asks "where" will I need this fact?

Homework Equations



--

The Attempt at a Solution



So I proved that the number 1 itself is the multiplicative identity, and it is also definitely in this set Q[√2]. Now I need to show that there exists an inverse of A so that A×A-1 = 1. And of course A-1 must also be an element of Q[√2].

so let q = a + b√2, then find q-1 = c + d√2 so that

(a + b√2)(c + d√2) = 1.

So we have
ac + ad√2 + cb√2 + 2bd = 1
ac + 2bd + (ad + cb)√2 = 1.

Since √2 is irrational, α + β√2 = 1 implies α = 1, β = 0. This is where i need the fact that √2 is irrational (although i needed it to show 1 = 1Q[√2])

So ad + cb = 0 and ac + 2bd = 1. But how do show that solutions must always exist for these two equations, if I only have two equations but four unknowns? Am i even on the right track here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This appears to be a fairly advanced class so surely you are already familiar with "rationalizing the denominator"! If x= 1/(a+b\sqrt{2}) then
x= \dfrac{1}{a+ b\sqrt{2}}\dfrac{a-b\sqrt{2}}{(a- b\sqrt{2}}= \dfrac{a- b\sqrt{2}}{a^2- 2b^2}
Of course, both a/(a^2- 2b^2) and -b/(a^2- 2b^2) are rational as long as a^2- 2b^2 is not 0! That is the part that requires that \sqrt{2} not be rational.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Of course, the first thing i thought it was the reciprocal, but sometimes I get so worked up in these so-called "advanced" courses that i forget such simple things i learned in high school. I guess it's time i put it all together.

Thanks very much for your help, HallsofIvy!

Edit: while this may be an advanced class, the stuff we are doing is far from advanced!
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K