MHB More Logic statements and arguments

  • Thread starter Thread starter ertagon2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logic
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on homework questions related to logic statements and truth tables. Q8 is confirmed correct, while Q9 part 1 requires identifying the negation of a universal statement, which translates to an existential statement. Q9 part 2 is also confirmed correct, noting the negation of a conjunction. For Q10, it is clarified that both arguments are correct if the conclusion is true whenever the premises are true. The thread concludes with a solution intended for future reference.
ertagon2
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
So once again this is my homework:
View attachment 7706
If you could please check these answers and help me with Q.9 part 1

Q.8 is just checking if both expressions give the same values right ?
Q.9 part 1 I'm in the blind here
Q.9 part 2 seems logical
Q.10 So if i get this right... for the statement/argument to beright the part before $\therefore$ must give me 1 when $\land$ with part after $\therefore$

This is my truth table for Q.10
https://i.imgur.com/wnthwac.jpg
 

Attachments

  • maths 3.png
    maths 3.png
    20.9 KB · Views: 131
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi ertagon2,

Q8 is correct.

For Q9 part 1, the negation of a statement $\forall x : (\text{something})$ is $\exists x : \neg(\text{something})$. This means that you should have a statement equivalent to

$$\exists x\in D : \neg((x\le0)\vee(x\ge2))$$

One of the choices is indeed equivalent to that statement : do you see which one ?

Q9 part 2 is correct : the negation of $A\wedge B$ is $\neg A\vee\neg B$.

For Q10, if I'm not mistaken, both arguments are correct. The rule is that the statement after $\therefore$ (the conclusion) must be true whenever all the statements before $\therefore$ (the premises) are true. You need only check the lines in which all the premises are true; the other lines should be ignored.
 
castor28 said:
Hi ertagon2,

Q8 is correct.

For Q9 part 1, the negation of a statement $\forall x : (\text{something})$ is $\exists x : \neg(\text{something})$. This means that you should have a statement equivalent to

$$\exists x\in D : \neg((x\le0)\vee(x\ge2))$$

One of the choices is indeed equivalent to that statement : do you see which one ?

Q9 part 2 is correct : the negation of $A\wedge B$ is $\neg A\vee\neg B$.

For Q10, if I'm not mistaken, both arguments are correct. The rule is that the statement after $\therefore$ (the conclusion) must be true whenever all the statements before $\therefore$ (the premises) are true. You need only check the lines in which all the premises are true; the other lines should be ignored.

Here's the solution for future generations.
View attachment 7710
 

Attachments

  • maths4.png
    maths4.png
    20.7 KB · Views: 135
There is a nice little variation of the problem. The host says, after you have chosen the door, that you can change your guess, but to sweeten the deal, he says you can choose the two other doors, if you wish. This proposition is a no brainer, however before you are quick enough to accept it, the host opens one of the two doors and it is empty. In this version you really want to change your pick, but at the same time ask yourself is the host impartial and does that change anything. The host...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K