MHB More Logic statements and arguments

  • Thread starter Thread starter ertagon2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Logic
ertagon2
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
So once again this is my homework:
View attachment 7706
If you could please check these answers and help me with Q.9 part 1

Q.8 is just checking if both expressions give the same values right ?
Q.9 part 1 I'm in the blind here
Q.9 part 2 seems logical
Q.10 So if i get this right... for the statement/argument to beright the part before $\therefore$ must give me 1 when $\land$ with part after $\therefore$

This is my truth table for Q.10
https://i.imgur.com/wnthwac.jpg
 

Attachments

  • maths 3.png
    maths 3.png
    20.9 KB · Views: 122
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi ertagon2,

Q8 is correct.

For Q9 part 1, the negation of a statement $\forall x : (\text{something})$ is $\exists x : \neg(\text{something})$. This means that you should have a statement equivalent to

$$\exists x\in D : \neg((x\le0)\vee(x\ge2))$$

One of the choices is indeed equivalent to that statement : do you see which one ?

Q9 part 2 is correct : the negation of $A\wedge B$ is $\neg A\vee\neg B$.

For Q10, if I'm not mistaken, both arguments are correct. The rule is that the statement after $\therefore$ (the conclusion) must be true whenever all the statements before $\therefore$ (the premises) are true. You need only check the lines in which all the premises are true; the other lines should be ignored.
 
castor28 said:
Hi ertagon2,

Q8 is correct.

For Q9 part 1, the negation of a statement $\forall x : (\text{something})$ is $\exists x : \neg(\text{something})$. This means that you should have a statement equivalent to

$$\exists x\in D : \neg((x\le0)\vee(x\ge2))$$

One of the choices is indeed equivalent to that statement : do you see which one ?

Q9 part 2 is correct : the negation of $A\wedge B$ is $\neg A\vee\neg B$.

For Q10, if I'm not mistaken, both arguments are correct. The rule is that the statement after $\therefore$ (the conclusion) must be true whenever all the statements before $\therefore$ (the premises) are true. You need only check the lines in which all the premises are true; the other lines should be ignored.

Here's the solution for future generations.
View attachment 7710
 

Attachments

  • maths4.png
    maths4.png
    20.7 KB · Views: 127
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...

Similar threads

Back
Top