News Moscow Subway bombings kill 35+ civilians

  • Thread starter Thread starter MotoH
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
At least 38 civilians were killed and over 60 injured in two suicide bombings on the Moscow Metro, believed to be carried out by female attackers. No group has claimed responsibility for the attacks, which occurred during the busy morning rush hour. Discussions around the bombings have highlighted the ongoing conflict between Russia and Chechen rebels, with some expressing hope for a strong Russian response. The tragic nature of such attacks often leads to a disconnect between the reality of violence and public perception, as media coverage can sanitize the impact of these events. The incident has reignited debates about the historical tensions between Russia and Chechnya, underscoring the complexity of the conflict.
  • #31
pallidin said:
You have got to be kidding. This thread has nothing to do with terrorism?
Let's see... radicals kill civilians.

No, I am not kidding. Please knock off the high school level comments, and provide some substance to the discussion of this current event. Otherwise, post your comments at the bottom of those YouTube videos, this isn't the place for them.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
OK, Cyrus, point-blank...

What's your opinion of blowing people up to propagate an ideology with respect to that region?
My opinion is that these perps should be taken down, and I offered the vid's to show that this can be done. That was the only reason for the vid's.

Should you have some other idea on how to resolve this short of a direct military action, please share.
 
  • #33
pallidin said:
OK, Cyrus, point-blank...

What's your opinion of blowing people up to propagate an ideology with respect to that region?
My opinion is that these perps should be taken down, and I offered the vid's to show that this can be done. That was the only reason for the vid's.

Should you have some other idea on how to resolve this short of a direct military action, please share.

How do you feel?

I think you should go read more books, articles, and newspapers. I am under no obligation to furnish you with any solutions to this problem. Please stop pretending to play the role of counter terrorist expert. It looks ridiculous.

But, I do love the cockiness of your post: "these perps should be taken down", sir, yes sir Jack Bauer!
 
Last edited:
  • #34
pallidin said:
OK, Cyrus, point-blank...

What's your opinion of blowing people up to propagate an ideology with respect to that region?
My opinion is that these perps should be taken down, and I offered the vid's to show that this can be done. That was the only reason for the vid's.

Should you have some other idea on how to resolve this short of a direct military action, please share.

How do you feel?

I don't know the details of this, and would like to be educated. But if the rebels feel this strongly about it, this rebellion is going to manifest itself for generations. Instead of going back in history and figuring out who are the good guys, and who are the bad guys, can't we just make an assumption that they are both better off being separate countries?
 
  • #35
Killing innocent civilians is called Terrorism all over the world. People who believe in law and order agree that terrorists must be destroyed.
 
  • #36
GeorgCantor said:
People who believe in law and order agree that terrorists must be destroyed.

No, they don't actually. The US military knows it cannot kill every single terrorist, so instead they try to remove the environmental stimuli which leads them to terrorism in the first place. You really should watch CSPAN more often when generals give speeches. That's why Bush was trying to win the 'Hearts and Minds' of the Iraqis. Think about that.
 
  • #37
This may be an almost laughable analogy, but would you guys consider the rebels in Star Wars terrorists?
 
  • #38
GeorgCantor said:
Killing innocent civilians is called Terrorism all over the world. People who believe in law and order agree that terrorists must be destroyed.

Yep...
 
  • #39
Cyrus said:
No, they don't actually. The US military knows it cannot kill every single terrorist, so instead they try to remove the environmental stimuli which leads them to terrorism in the first place. You really should watch CSPAN more often when generals give speeches. That's why Bush was trying to win the 'Hearts and Minds' of the Iraqis. Think about that.


How would you EVER remove all the "environemental stimuli which leads them to terrorism"? Sounds like utopia to me. What do you think we should do to those that already killed innocent people, but destroy them in the same manner they spilled innocent blood?
 
  • #40
GeorgCantor said:
How would you EVER remove all the "environemental stimuli which leads them to terrorism"? Sounds like utopia to me. What do you think we should do to those that already killed innocent people, but destroy them in the same manner they spilled innocent blood?

Perhaps, you should see the report I linked. Start there. Considering I was at a talk given by a former Lt. General, and now Counter terrorism expert at the State Department, I'm going to have to disagree with you.
 
  • #41
Cyrus said:
...try to remove the environmental stimuli which leads them to terrorism in the first place.

Their "environmental" stimuli is, in fact, their ideology.
One and the same.
 
  • #42
pallidin said:
Their "environmental" stimuli is, in fact, their ideology.
One and the same.

Jesus Christ, stop talking. Start reading. Seriously.

Better yet, from now on, give me a link to every claimed factual statement you make, because this is getting out of hand.
 
  • #43
Cyrus...

From your posts I assume you are against "innocent killing" with respect to the events posted by the OP. (Note:.. I'm staying on subject)
 
  • #44
Cyrus said:
Perhaps, you should see the report I linked. Start there. Considering I was at a talk given by a former Lt. General, and now Counter terrorism expert at the State Department, I'm going to have to disagree with you.


This Lt.General is entitled to his opinion and you should take it for what it's worth - an opinion.

There is no resolution to terrorism and there will never ever be. The rest is utopia. Given the impossibility to stamp out terrorism, the only way is fight it lawfully.

Do you think we should remove all environmental stimuli for people who become criminals and dismantle police forces? I am not aware of there being such a society.
 
  • #45
GeorgCantor said:
There is no resolution to terrorism and there will never ever be.

But there is! DESTRUCTION.
 
  • #46
calculusrocks said:
I don't know the details of this, and would like to be educated. But if the rebels feel this strongly about it, this rebellion is going to manifest itself for generations. Instead of going back in history and figuring out who are the good guys, and who are the bad guys, can't we just make an assumption that they are both better off being separate countries?

Russia will never let the separation happen. It might take a couple of generations to heal the wounds on both sides. But eventually, the unemployment will go down, the economy will improve, and people in Chechnya will lose their interest in separatism. This kind of scenario already took place in the 19th century. I don't see why it should be different this time.
 
  • #47
Cyrus said:
The US military knows it cannot kill every single terrorist, so instead they try to remove the environmental stimuli which leads them to terrorism in the first place. You really should watch CSPAN more often when generals give speeches. That's why Bush was trying to win the 'Hearts and Minds' of the Iraqis. Think about that.

Russian authorities in Chechnya are doing the same. Aren't they?
 
  • #48
The problem with a suicide bomber is that there isn't anything anybody can do. They are already dead, so they are beyond prosecution and punishment. There is also the problem that you can't prosecute anyone for something which they haven't done, so there really isn't much else you can do than try to create incentives for people to not blow themselves up.

There is a reason why this is called an asymmetric threat.

No conventional methods of warfare, or even police work, are useful strategies when confronting suicide bombers. If you start killing people you *think* perhaps *might* become suicide bombers some day, you are exacerbating the problem. You are also creating another problem for yourself which is that of not respecting your own laws for civil conduct.

All the "tough" boys who are commenting here, demanding retaliation and special forces and whatnot, are morons. Grow up. You cannot beat someone who has decided to kill themselves in action. They are beyond reproach. All you can do is to make them not make that decision to begin with - which makes this a political problem. Trying to be the strong arm of the law is precisely what they want you to do, and a sure way to lose.

An asymmetric threat must be confronted with asymmetric means.
 
  • #49
meopemuk said:
This was not the deadliest terrorist attack in Russia's modern history. 170 people were killed in a Moscow theater in 2002. There were 334 victims of the Beslan school siege in 2004. So, I don't think that this time the response will take some epic proportions.

Moscow theater death toll was due to excess amount of sedative, Fentanyl (a simple Narcan injection or inhalation would've been the antidote), Beslan school is in North Ossetia (which most Russians will agree we do not care much for) - yes many children died, and death toll is high, but that is yet again an operational incompetence by the FSB.

This time the attack is at the heart of Russia, a few miles from Kremlin. This attack is more personal to Russia as a country than any other one combined. It brought fear to the very seat of government, and if you think that will be taken lightly, try again.

As far as I'm concerned there will be civil rights violations, killing of innocent civilians and an escalation of military presence in the south. Even Georgia might get back handed if it gives a lip to Russia this time, international observers or not.
All the "tough" boys who are commenting here, demanding retaliation and special forces and whatnot, are morons. Grow up

Yeah? You think anyone cares about your terminology or analysis on the matter? They will roll tanks into the city center in the next few weeks, bomb a few 'suspected' terrorist holdouts and rape women and children. Then they will do this until they find one of the leaders like Dokka Umarov. There won't be a news coverage.

The problem with a suicide bomber is that there isn't anything anybody can do. They are already dead, so they are beyond prosecution and punishment. There is also the problem that you can't prosecute anyone for something which they haven't done, so there really isn't much else you can do than try to create incentives for people to not blow themselves up.

You can kill their entire family and make sure the next time someone even thinks about becoming a terrorist realizes about the consequences ('Teach your children better, or die' style). You can hunt down whoever assisted the bomber and kill them (Mossad style). You can kill whoever funded them (In a different category of assistance, but nonetheless important as it sprouts the leadership of terrorist organizations not just the operational staff itself). There is always someone who is guilty of something. There is no such thing as an innocent civilian - they are all combatants the second they pick up a weapon, and most of them do. If they are not fighting then they are hiding and abbeting the terrorists.
 
Last edited:
  • #50
The first explosion was right next to the FSB headquarters if I am not mistaken.
 
  • #51
meopemuk said:
Russian authorities in Chechnya are doing the same. Aren't they?

I am not knowledgeable enough with that part of the world to give you an answer to that question. I would have to look at what the Russian brass has been saying and doing in the media, but if you have any references about this I would be open to reading them.
 
  • #52
cronxeh said:
Beslan school is in North Ossetia

This is true.

cronxeh said:
(which most Russians will agree we do not care much for)

This is not true. Most Russians do care about Ossetian children. When neighboring South Ossetia was in trouble Russians came to the rescue sacrificing their lives and ignoring international condemnation.



cronxeh said:
They will roll tanks into the city center in the next few weeks, bomb a few 'suspected' terrorist holdouts and rape women and children. Then they will do this until they find one of the leaders like Dokka Umarov. There won't be a news coverage [...] There is no such thing as an innocent civilian


Oh, please! Calm down.
 
  • #53
MotoH said:
The first explosion was right next to the FSB headquarters if I am not mistaken.

Yes, Lubyanka station is right next to FSB and 10 minutes walk from the Red Square.
 
  • #54
Max Faust said:
All the "tough" boys who are commenting here, demanding retaliation and special forces and whatnot, are morons. Grow up. You cannot beat someone who has decided to kill themselves in action. They are beyond reproach. All you can do is to make them not make that decision to begin with - which makes this a political problem.

Extremism can not be dealt with through politics because the foundation is idealogical.

The only option is to arrest/take-out the leaders, blow-up their meetings places, etc...
Having THEN taken care of the immediate threat, humanitarian re-education can proceed.

Just my opinion though...
 
  • #55
pallidin said:
The only option is to arrest/take-out the leaders, blow-up their meetings places, etc...
Having THEN taken care of the immediate threat, humanitarian re-education can proceed.
I think that was also SAC's plan -however the terrorists got there first
 
  • #56
pallidin said:
Extremism can not be dealt with through politics because the foundation is idealogical.

The only option is to arrest/take-out the leaders, blow-up their meetings places, etc...
Having THEN taken care of the immediate threat, humanitarian re-education can proceed.

Just my opinion though...

Yes, you've already stated your talking points several times over in this thread - we get it.
 
  • #57
Isn't it a common phenomena that Chechen terrorists are female?

According to my understanding this is related to the Russian policy of killing all young Chechen males as terrorists. The Chechen females naturally are not going to turn into alternative sexuals simply because of the lack of guys. These women go after their guys... and take some Russians with them.
 
  • #58
jostpuur said:
...the Russian policy of killing all young Chechen males as terrorists.

Never heard of such a policy.

jostpuur said:
These women go after their guys... and take some Russians with them.

These women are called "black widows" in the Caucasus. They wear black dresses and their sole purpose in life is the revenge for their fallen husbands, sons, brothers, ...
 
  • #59
Cyrus said:
Yes, you've already stated your talking points several times over in this thread - we get it.

Great! Glad to see your in the camp.
 
  • #60
meopemuk said:
jostpuur said:
... the Russian policy of killing all young Chechen males as terrorists.
Never heard of such a policy.

I was left under this impression after watching some documentary, which was uploaded to youtube.
 

Similar threads

News Who is to Blame for Baghdad Blast Killing 2 Britons?
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Was the Bombing of Dresden Justified?
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
News Mr. President: Coffins ? Bring Them On ?
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K