Most efficient convergent nozzle

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
7 replies · 3K views
T C
Messages
418
Reaction score
11
I want to know what's the most efficient type convergent nozzle available now at present. I means what's the shape that is most efficient for a convergent nozzle. By efficiency, I want to mean that the inlet velocity to throat velocity ratio will be as close as possible to the throat area to inlet area ratio.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
T C said:
I want to know what's the most efficient type convergent nozzle available now at present. I means what's the shape that is most efficient for a convergent nozzle. By efficiency, I want to mean that the inlet velocity to throat velocity ratio will be as close as possible to the throat area to inlet area ratio.
Wellllll...for incompressible flow, all nozzles must meet that criteria due to conservation of mass (continuity).

And for compressible flow, the velocity ratio and area ratio are by definition unchained.

So the question doesn't make a lot of sense to me, but for most of your questions the answer of a De Laval nozzle should suffice.

It would probably be better, though, to specify what you are trying to do - what fluid and conditions you are looking for, entering and leaving, and engineer your device from there.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jim hardy
This book has a good chapter on how to design them for steam using a Mollier chart.
upload_2019-1-20_10-31-17.png


I suppose the principles would apply to other compressible fluids.

Another good reference for steam, but harder to find, would be Salisbury's classic

https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0042GKXMI/?tag=pfamazon01-20

old jim
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-1-20_10-31-17.png
    upload_2019-1-20_10-31-17.png
    26.1 KB · Views: 603
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
Convergent nozzles tend to be pretty efficient, though if you're running a compressible fluid with a high(ish) mach number, your velocity ratios and area ratios won't match due to compressibility effects. What's your application and why are you so concerned with nozzle efficiency?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
If you're measuring flow
in my plant , for feedwater flow we used a converging-diverging Venturi tube made to ASME standards.

upload_2019-1-21_14-56-11.png


To best of my memory It had a discharge coefficient of 0.995 so was pretty doggone 'efficient' .
That measurement we used to calculate the reactor's power production so we wanted it accurate - even applied corrections for local gravity.

See ASME's book "Fluid Meters"
https://www.asme.org/products/books/fluid-meters-theory-application-sixth

here's an overview ,
ftp://ftp.unicauca.edu.co/Facultades/FIET/DEIC/Materias/Instrumentacion%20Industrial/Instrument_Engineers__Handbook_-_Process_Measurement_and_Analysis/Instrument%20Engineers'%20Handbook%20-%20Process%20Measurement%20and%20Analysis/1083ch2_29.pdf

in my circles that ASME book is "The Bible": .
 

Attachments

  • upload_2019-1-21_14-56-11.png
    upload_2019-1-21_14-56-11.png
    10.9 KB · Views: 686
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ChemAir
Thanks to everybody for their contributions.