Most likely speed in Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on determining the most likely speed in the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, specifically using the equation f(v)dv=4π(m/2πkT)^(3/2)v^2Exp(-mv^2/2kT)dv. Participants clarify that to find the maximum of f(v), one can differentiate the natural logarithm of f instead of f itself, as both will yield the same maximum speed value. The conversation also confirms that applying a monotonic function to another preserves the location of extremes, as demonstrated through the chain rule in calculus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically differentiation and the chain rule
  • Knowledge of statistical mechanics concepts
  • Basic understanding of exponential functions and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution equation
  • Learn about the properties of monotonic functions in calculus
  • Explore applications of the chain rule in optimization problems
  • Investigate the significance of the most probable speed in kinetic theory
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those studying thermodynamics and statistical mechanics, as well as anyone interested in mathematical optimization techniques.

Vrbic
Messages
400
Reaction score
18

Homework Statement


What is the most likely speed in Maxwell-Boltzamann distribution?

Homework Equations


f(v)dv=4\pi(\frac{m}{2 \pi kT})^{3/2}v^2Exp(-\frac{mv^2}{2kT})dv

The Attempt at a Solution


I know I need maximum of f(v) -> \frac{df}{dv}=0. But it is not trivial to do. I found some solution where they said: \frac{d}{dv^2}(\ln[v^2Exp(-\frac{mv^2}{2kT})])=0. But I don't know how they arrive to it. Could somebody advise?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Oooou sry, it is easy. I made a mistake I derivate f(v) - function without v2 term. Otherwise, why they can rewrite this problem to logarithm and derivative according to v2.
 
They just felt like its easier to differentiate the natural log of f, rather than f itself. Both f and its natural log have a maximum at the same value of v.
 
Chestermiller said:
They just felt like its easier to differentiate the natural log of f, rather than f itself. Both f and its natural log have a maximum at the same value of v.
Thank you for your response. So can I say generally that if I apply some monotonic function to other, that extremes stay at same point?
 
Vrbic said:
Thank you for your response. So can I say generally that if I apply some monotonic function to other, that extremes stay at same point?
What are your thoughts on this?

Chet
 
Chestermiller said:
What are your thoughts on this?

Chet
What are you asking me now? How or my oppinion if it is true?
 
Vrbic said:
What are you asking me now? How or my oppinion if it is true?
I'm asking to see if you can reason it out mathematically.
 
Chestermiller said:
I'm asking to see if you can reason it out mathematically.
No. I just ask :)
 
Suppose g(y) is a monotoically increasing function of y, and y(x) is a function of x with a maximum. Then, by the chain rule,
$$\frac{dg}{dx}=\frac{dg}{dy}\frac{dy}{dx}$$
dg/dy is always positive, so dg/dx has a zero derivative at the same location where dy/dx has a zero derivative.
 
  • #10
Chestermiller said:
Suppose g(y) is a monotoically increasing function of y, and y(x) is a function of x with a maximum. Then, by the chain rule,
$$\frac{dg}{dx}=\frac{dg}{dy}\frac{dy}{dx}$$
dg/dy is always positive, so dg/dx has a zero derivative at the same location where dy/dx has a zero derivative.
Very nice ;) It is true what I said.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
760
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K