Motion in 2d w/ constant acceleration

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the vertical displacement of an electron beam in a cathode ray tube while it travels a horizontal distance of 0.42 meters with a constant horizontal velocity of 2.7 x 107 m/s. The gravitational acceleration is given as 9.8 m/s2. The user initially calculated the time of travel as 1.556 x 10-8 seconds and found the vertical displacement to be 1.186 x 10-15 meters. The error was identified as a miscalculation in significant figures, which is crucial for accurate results in physics problems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of 2D motion equations
  • Knowledge of kinematic equations for constant acceleration
  • Familiarity with significant figures in scientific calculations
  • Basic principles of projectile motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Review kinematic equations for 2D motion
  • Learn about significant figures and their importance in physics
  • Explore projectile motion concepts in detail
  • Practice problems involving constant acceleration in two dimensions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on kinematics and motion in two dimensions, as well as educators looking for examples of common mistakes in calculations.

luna02525
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a tv set, an electron beam moves with horizontal velocity 2.7 x 10^7 m/s across the cathode ray tube and strikes the screen, 42 cm away. The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s^2.

How far does the electron beam fall while traversing this distance? Answer in units of m.

Homework Equations



x-direction:

v_{xo} = 2.7 x 10^7 m/s
\Delta{x} = .42 m

y-direction:
a_{y} = 9.8 m/s^2
\Delta{y} = ? m

a_{y} = 9.8
v= 9.8t + v_{y0}
y= 4.9t^2 + v_{y0}t + y_{0}

The Attempt at a Solution



I first tried to solve for time:

.42 = 2.7*10^7(t)
t = 1.556*10^{-8}

Then, I tried solving for \Delta{y}

\Delta{y} = v_{0y}t + (1/2)gt^2
\Delta{y} = 0 + 4.9(1.556*10^{-8}
\Delta{y} = 1.186*10^{-15}

however, this is turning up as incorrect. Where did I go wrong? What am I doing incorrectly?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks OK to me. What makes you think it's wrong?

(If it's an on-line system, be sure to use a reasonable number of significant figures.)
 
It was indeed my significant figures!

Thanks for taking a look at my work. :smile: I was afraid I was completely off.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K