Motion in 2d w/ constant acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the vertical displacement of an electron beam in a cathode ray tube while it travels horizontally 42 cm at a speed of 2.7 x 10^7 m/s. The user initially calculated the time taken for the beam to travel this distance and then attempted to find the vertical fall using the equations of motion under constant acceleration due to gravity. The first calculation for time was correct, but the user later realized that the issue with their final answer stemmed from not using the appropriate number of significant figures. The importance of significant figures in physics calculations was emphasized as a common source of error. The user expressed relief upon discovering the mistake, indicating that their understanding of the problem was fundamentally sound.
luna02525
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a tv set, an electron beam moves with horizontal velocity 2.7 x 10^7 m/s across the cathode ray tube and strikes the screen, 42 cm away. The acceleration of gravity is 9.8 m/s^2.

How far does the electron beam fall while traversing this distance? Answer in units of m.

Homework Equations



x-direction:

v_{xo} = 2.7 x 10^7 m/s
\Delta{x} = .42 m

y-direction:
a_{y} = 9.8 m/s^2
\Delta{y} = ? m

a_{y} = 9.8
v= 9.8t + v_{y0}
y= 4.9t^2 + v_{y0}t + y_{0}

The Attempt at a Solution



I first tried to solve for time:

.42 = 2.7*10^7(t)
t = 1.556*10^{-8}

Then, I tried solving for \Delta{y}

\Delta{y} = v_{0y}t + (1/2)gt^2
\Delta{y} = 0 + 4.9(1.556*10^{-8}
\Delta{y} = 1.186*10^{-15}

however, this is turning up as incorrect. Where did I go wrong? What am I doing incorrectly?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks OK to me. What makes you think it's wrong?

(If it's an on-line system, be sure to use a reasonable number of significant figures.)
 
It was indeed my significant figures!

Thanks for taking a look at my work. :smile: I was afraid I was completely off.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top