monty37
- 225
- 1
can the motion of a piston be considered simple harmonic,being periodic in nature?in*case of a reciprocating engine.
The discussion centers around whether the motion of a piston in a reciprocating engine can be classified as simple harmonic motion (SHM), given its periodic nature. Participants explore the characteristics of piston motion, including its sinusoidal properties, dwell time at top dead center (TDC), and the implications of connecting rod length and crankshaft throw ratios.
Participants express differing views on whether the piston motion can be classified as simple harmonic motion, with no consensus reached. The discussion includes multiple competing perspectives on the characteristics of the motion and the factors influencing it.
Limitations include the dependence on specific definitions of SHM, the impact of mechanical design on motion characteristics, and the unresolved mathematical complexities in analyzing piston motion.
monty37 said:but simple harmonic motion does not necessarily mean sinusoidal,the piston for every stroke moves up and down ,this is a continuous process,why should it not be SHM? please explain the infinitely long connecting rod as well.
Ranger Mike said:the piston has a finite dwell time ( in crankshaft degrees) at top dead center as verified with a degree wheel when properly installing a cam shaft..in other words , the piston " stops moving" for a short period of time ( number of crankshaft degrees) while at TDC