khil_phys
- 93
- 0
Would it be correct to say that light follows a cycloidal path in the presence of a gravitaitonal field, in accordance with the principle of least time?
The discussion revolves around the motion of light in a gravitational field, specifically examining whether light follows a cycloidal path or a brachistochrone path according to the principle of least time. The conversation touches on theoretical implications and interpretations of light's behavior in gravitational contexts.
Participants express disagreement regarding whether light follows a cycloidal path or a brachistochrone path, indicating that multiple competing views remain without a consensus.
The discussion includes assumptions about initial conditions and the definitions of paths in gravitational fields, which remain unresolved.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brachistochrone_curve#The_brachistochrone_is_the_cycloidoli4 said:Why cycloidal ? don't you mean brachistochronic ?
No. The brachistochrone is quickest path in gravity for a massive object with zero initial velocity. But light already has an initial velocity, and the path is dependent on its initial direction.khil_phys said:Would it be correct to say that light follows a cycloidal path in the presence of a gravitaitonal field, in accordance with the principle of least time?
oli4 said:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brachis...is_the_cycloid[/QUOTE]
Thank you A.T. :)