Move over Enya there's a new kid in town

  • Thread starter Thread starter jedishrfu
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the creation of music by computer AI, particularly focusing on algorithmic composition and its implications for human expressiveness in music. Participants explore the nature of music, the role of technology in composition, and personal experiences with algorithmic music.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about the ability of AI to capture the essence of music as a human activity, arguing that music cannot be reduced to an algorithm.
  • One participant shares a personal experience of being obsessed with algorithmic composition, noting that it affected their enjoyment of music until they recognized the importance of human communication in music.
  • Another participant mentions a specific album, Disco Alliance, as an example of great music created for synthesizers, emphasizing the importance of arrangement and expressiveness.
  • A participant reflects on the idea that creating music through programming can also be a form of human expressiveness, suggesting that not all music creation needs to follow traditional methods.
  • References are made to historical examples of algorithmic composition, such as Mozart's musical Dice Game and the Fugues of Bach, indicating that the concept is not new.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role of AI in music creation, with some valuing the human element in music and others considering algorithmic composition as a valid form of expression. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of AI in music and the nature of expressiveness.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight various assumptions about the nature of music and expressiveness, as well as the historical context of algorithmic composition, but these remain open to interpretation and debate.

Technology news on Phys.org
Interesting article. I used to be obsessed with algorithmic composition. That was until it temporarily destroyed my ability to enjoy music. But that's my problem. I recovered when I realized that music only means something to me when it's humans communicating what's in their heart to other humans. Fortunately we have not figured out the algorithm for that sort of thing.

Now there is so much algorithmic music, we need an algorithm that will tell us what to listen to. Along with ads no doubt. And patents to protect "intellectual property." I'm sick of it.

Anyway, I would like to comment on one paragraph from the article.

"One obstacle was that not only was this music composed by computers, it was also played by computer synthesis, and so lacking the interpretation and expressivity of human musicians who bring each tune to life – elements not incorporated in the data the AI had trained on. "

The obstacle is not understanding the nature of music. It's a human activity that can't be reduced to an algorithm.

There's great music for the synthesizer. My favorite example is the album Disco Alliance by the Latvian group Zodiak. This was made way back in 1980 in the good old USSR. I've read it was the best selling album in the USSR for a while. If you search on Youtube you will find it. It's great synth music because it's great music which is arranged superbly for the synthesizer. It's very expressive.

I can also think of lots of music which is played by expressive humans, but does nothing for me. It's just not good music, in my book.
 
My first album of experimental music was the Minotaur. It was quite surreal. The artist was a professional whistler with perfect pitch playing a moog.



From this album

 
On second thought, I suppose creating a program which creates music is a type of human expressiveness. Some of us express ourselves in a LISP or C program. Who says we all must do music the old-fashioned way?

This reminds me. In the movie Forbidden Planet, there is a scene in which Dr. Morbius plays a brief recording of some of the Krell music. This fascinated me, because why would such an advanced species as the Krell spend time on music? How did it benefit them? Also I wondered if they used algorithmic composition.

By the way, this idea of algorithmic composition is not new. Books have been written over the centuries on this topic. Mozart created his famous musical Dice Game to entertain his aristocratic hosts.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
6K
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K