Moving electric field effect on dielectric/gas

AI Thread Summary
A moving electric field can potentially create a drag force on gas, similar to the effect of physical blades. When an electric field is applied to a dielectric, it induces polarization, which may influence the gas dynamics within a confined space, such as a pipe. The discussion explores whether the polarization of the gas can lead to a drag effect as the electric field moves. Key equations of state and momentum balance are considered to analyze the interaction between the electric field and the gas. Ultimately, the relationship between the movement of charged wires and the resulting forces on the gas is central to understanding this phenomenon.
artis
Messages
1,479
Reaction score
976
So I was wondering, can a moving electric field produce a drag force on gas for example similar to that which would result from physical blades moving the gas.

Electric field applied to a dielectric if not as strong as to produce breakdown produces polarization. I wonder can this polarization create a drag on the dielectric medium if the electric field moves in time and space.

For a simple example think of a pipe filled with gas, take two wires charged to a high potential and located at the sides of the pipe, the pipe itself is of such material as to allow the E field lines to pass through, surely it would attenuate the field but for the sake of argument suppose it doesn't.
So we drag the two charged wires along the length of the pipe, what would be the effect on the gas within the pipe?

My own idea is that either the polarization from the field passes along the gas but in such a way that each next segment is simply being polarized without any drag on it or the previously polarized segment tends to be pulled along and so creates a push on the gas in front of it creating drag.?thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a classic problem that asks you to calculate the force required to pull a dieletric out of a parallel plate capacitor. The key is the motion of the edge of the dielectric slab, since that determines what percent of the field sees a polarizable medium and what percent sees vacuum.

In the case of the gas in the pipe, you will also need to factor in the equation of state and momentum balance: $$\rho \frac{D\vec{u}}{Dt} = -\nabla p - (\vec{P} \cdot \nabla) \vec{E} = 0$$ $$ k_B T \nabla n = -(\vec{P} \cdot \nabla) \vec{E}$$ where ##p## is the pressure, ##\vec{P}## is the polarization density, and ##\frac{D\vec{u}}{Dt}## is the material derivative of fluid velocity (zero in this case, because we're assuming steady state) where in the last bit I made the assumption that the wires are moving slowly enough that the gas is in thermal equilibrium. From this you can solve for the density, and thus the susceptibility everywhere in the gas. From there you can find the electrostatic energy, and then calculate the electrostatic energy, and lastly the force by taking the derivative of the electrostatic energy with respect to the wires' positions.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top