Programs MS in Statistics or Data-mining

  • Thread starter Thread starter sarpy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statistics
Click For Summary
Choosing between a Master's in Statistics and a Master's in Data Mining is a significant decision for those interested in a career in marketing analytics. A background in applied mathematics and computer science, along with a strong GPA, positions candidates well for either path. Statistics is a well-established field, providing a solid foundation, while data mining is rapidly evolving, offering opportunities for growth and innovation. The discussion highlights that data mining leverages the vast amounts of data generated today, emphasizing the importance of combining programming skills with statistical knowledge. Concerns about the maturity of data mining are addressed, suggesting that its growth potential makes it an attractive option. Ultimately, the decision should consider personal interests in programming versus mathematics and the desire to engage in both disciplines in a professional setting.
sarpy
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,

So i'am really facing a hard time deciding weather to choose a Ms in Statistics or data-mining

(please bear with my english as it's not my first language)

a little bit about my background :

.)a bachelor of science in applied mathematics and computer science
.)good Gpa
.)like mathematics and especially statistics so much
.)like computer science and programming even more
.)i prefer programming to mathematics but ideally i would prefer to use both in a job
.)my goal is a career in marketing analytics but right now i want to get further in my studies.

So basically according to the few researches i did and the conversations i had with few professors and professionals, my impression is that data-mining is a new field and it's not mature enough although it evolves rapidly whereas statistics is an old field, a well established science and is going to be a safe bet with some programming skills.

i need to hear your opinions about these insights first then i would like to know the difference between a dataminer and a statistician according to you and finally which choice is going to be wiser : a MS in DM or MS in Stats for a career in analytics.

any opinion is welcome, thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My two cents:
I wouldn't be afraid of a field that is "not mature". There will be a lot of growth in that field. Plain statistics often suffers from a lack of data and you may depend on others to collect data for you. Data mining recognizes that we currently have the ability to generate tremendous amounts of data that no one has the time to even look at. It will be great to have the combination of computer techniques to collect and process data, with the statistical background to analyse the results.
 
  • Like
Likes sarpy
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
602
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
817
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
518