Multichannel Square Tube Hydraulic Diameter

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the Hydraulic Diameter for a multichannel rectangular tube with six smaller channels (7.15mm L x 3.54mm W) and one larger channel (7.15mm L x 5mm W). The participants conclude that neither summing the Hydraulic Diameters of individual channels nor neglecting the inner walls is effective. Instead, the recommended approach is to treat each channel as an independent flow path to accurately account for frictional pressure drops caused by the inner walls.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hydraulic Diameter calculations
  • Familiarity with fluid dynamics concepts
  • Knowledge of pressure drop due to friction in flow systems
  • Basic principles of channel flow in rectangular tubes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Hydraulic Diameter calculations for multiple channels"
  • Study "Frictional pressure drop in fluid flow"
  • Learn about "Independent flow paths in fluid dynamics"
  • Explore "Rectangular channel flow analysis techniques"
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, fluid dynamics researchers, and anyone involved in the design or analysis of hydraulic systems with multiple flow channels will benefit from this discussion.

chupacabras
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am new to this forum.

I read the thread about the water flow in a rectangular tube because I wanted to correlate what was being said into my own problem.

My question I believe is very simple:

I have a rectangular tube that has inner dividers, let's say that my tube has 6 channels inside that are 7.15mm L X 3.54mm W, plus a 7th channel 7.15mm L X 5mm W.

Lets's say also that if I neglect the inner walls, the result is a bigger rectangle, roughly 29.3mm L x 7.15mm W.

I need to come up with the Hydraulic Diameter for the whole tube.

What is the approach I should take:

a) should I add the seven Hydraulic Diameters for each inner tube?

b) should I neglect the inner walls and calculate for the whole tube?

When I add up each channel's HDs, the results is 3 times higher than when I calculate for the whole tube, neglecting the inner walls.


I would really like your input on this subject, and I am sorry if this is so simple I had overlooked the answer.

Thanks,
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
hi chup
a) should I add the seven Hydraulic Diameters for each inner tube?
That won't work, you'll get an enormous equivalent pipe diameter.

b) should I neglect the inner walls and calculate for the whole tube?
That won't work either. The inner walls create frictional pressure drop that you'd be neglecting.

The only way I know of to do this is to treat all seven diameters as independent flow paths.
 
Q_Goest: Thank you, that seems to be the most logical approach.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
15K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
12K