Multipole expansion. Problems with understanding derivatives

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 3K views
Lindsayyyy
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone

Homework Statement



I want to find the multipole expansion of

[tex]\Phi(\vec r)= \frac {1}{4\pi \epsilon_0} \int d^3 r' \frac {\rho(\vec r')}{|\vec r -\vec r'|}[/tex]

Homework Equations



Taylor series

The Attempt at a Solution



My attempt at a solution was to use the Taylor series. I tried to approach 1/|r-r'| around r'/r (that's what the task told me to, because r>>r').

I found the taylor series for [tex]\frac {1}{\sqrt{(1-x)}}[/tex]

Which I can use I guess for this problem, where my x is:
[tex]2 \frac {\vec r\vec r'}{r^2} -\frac {r'^2}{r^2}[/tex]

so I get

[tex]\frac {1}{| \vec r - \vec r'|}= \frac {1}{r} \frac {1}{\sqrt{ 1- 2 \frac {\vec r \vec r'}{r^2} + \frac {r'^2}{r^2}}}[/tex]But now I'm stuck. I don't know how to handle the derivates. Do I only have to derive the vector r' with nabla or r'^2 aswell?

Thanks for your help in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I understand your question, you will need to take partial derivatives of the r'2 term as well as the r##\cdot##r' term with respect to x', y', and z'. Just think of the argument of the square root as some function of x', y', and z'.
 
Use the vector form of Taylor Expansion i.e.
f(x+h) = f(x) + (h.grad)f(x) + [(h.grad)^2]f(x) + ...

where x and h are vectors, grad is the usual gradient operator and "." indicates the dot product.
 
Thanks for your help. I know that this has something to do with Nabla, but I don't understand why I have to use Nabla here actually.
 
you just have to use the binomial expansion for the term which you got in op.Different higher order terms in r'/r represents monopoles,dipoles,quadrupoles etc.
 
Last edited:
Lindsayyyy said:
Thanks for your help. I know that this has something to do with Nabla, but I don't understand why I have to use Nabla here actually.

I think what you're referring to as nabla is what I call grad.

Just do the vector taylor expansion as I mentioned, this was the box standard thing to do back in electrodynamics exams. Oh, and use summation convention to make life easier.