Multipole Expansion: Show that the quadrupole moment is symmetric and that the trace vanished

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the trace of the quadrupole moment matrix, specifically addressing the symmetry of the quadrupole moment and the condition that its trace vanishes. The subject area includes concepts from electromagnetism and tensor analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of the trace and question the correctness of intermediate steps. There is a focus on the interpretation of terms and the implications of summation over indices. Some participants suggest clarifying the notation used for the variables involved.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided hints and suggestions for re-evaluating the calculations. There is an ongoing exploration of the expressions involved, with some participants recognizing potential mistakes in earlier posts. The discussion is productive, with participants actively engaging in clarifying the reasoning behind the calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of correctly interpreting the variables and the implications of charge distribution on the trace calculation. There is an acknowledgment of the need to ensure that assumptions about the symmetry and properties of the quadrupole moment are valid throughout the discussion.

Lambda96
Messages
233
Reaction score
77
Homework Statement
Show that the quadrupole moment is symmetric and that the trace vanished
Relevant Equations
none
Hi

i have problems, to solve task a)

Bildschirmfoto 2024-11-02 um 19.10.31.png

Since I have to calculate the trace of the matrix ##Q##, I started as follows:

$$\text{trace} (Q)=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{3}\int_{}^{}d^3x'(3x_i^{'2}-r^{'2}) \rho(x')$$

I then calculated further until I got the following form:

$$\text{trace} (Q)=\int_{}^{}d^3x' \cdot 2x'^{2} \rho(x')$$

Now I'm stuck because I don't know how to show that the expression is 0
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lambda96 said:
$$\text{trace} (Q)=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{3}\int_{}^{}d^3x'(3x_i^{'2}-r^{'2}) \rho(x')$$

I then calculated further until I got the following form:

$$\text{trace} (Q)=\int_{}^{}d^3x' \cdot 2x'^{2} \rho(x')$$
In getting to the second equation above, you made a mistake when evaluating ## \sum\limits_{i=1}^{3}r^{'2}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lambda96
TSny said:
In getting to the second equation above, you made a mistake when evaluating ## \sum\limits_{i=1}^{3}r^{'2}##.
I think the mistake is in dropping the subscript and writing ##x'^2## in OP's expression for the trace. What does that even mean?
(I deleted my post because it went in an unnecessary direction.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lambda96
kuruman said:
I think the mistake is in dropping the subscript and writing ##x'^2## in OP's expression for the trace. What does that even mean?
I interpreted the OP's ##x'^2## to mean the same as ##r'^2##.

I tried to guess how the OP got the incorrect factor of ##2x'^2##. The sum over ##i## of ##3{x'_i}^2## gives ##3r'^2##. Then I guessed that the OP just subtracted the ##r'^2## in the expression to get ##2r'^2## which they wrote as ##2x'^2##. But, I shouldn't have done all this guessing! Bad form on my part. :blushing:

Hopefully, the OP will clarify what they did.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kuruman
Hint: ##(3x^2 - r^2 ) + (3y^2 - r^2) + (3z^2 - r^2) ## equals what?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny and Lambda96
Thank you TSny, kuruman and PhDeezNutz for your help 👍👍👍

You are right TSny :smile: I proceeded as follows:

I interpreted ##r'^2## as follows:

$$r'^2=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{3}{x'}_i \cdot {x'}_i=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{3}{x'^2}_i={x'^2}_1+{x'^2}_2+{x'^2}_3$$

Then I calculated the following

$$\sum\limits_{i=1}^{3} \int_{}^{}d^3x'(3{x'^2}_i-{x'^2}_i) p(x’)$$
$$\sum\limits_{i=1}^{3} \int_{}^{}d^3x'\cdot 2{x'^2}_i p(x')$$
$$\int_{}^{}d^3x'\cdot 2({x'^2}_1+{x'^2}_2+{x'^2}_3) p(x')$$
$$\int_{}^{}d^3x'\cdot 2{x’^2} p(x')$$

In the end I should have written ##{r’}^2## instead of ##{x'}^2##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny
I strongly suggest you write out the terms in the sum explicitly. There’s only 3.

The first term is

##3{x’}_1^2 - r^2## where ##r^2 = {x’}_1^2 + {x’}_2^2 + {x’}_3^2##

Write out the next two terms and sum all 3 terms together. What do you realize?

@Lambda96 post is fixed now.

I think I see what you are doing and while it is valid I don't think it's the best approach. Simplify at the end when you have written out all terms and summed them instead of trying to prove each term is zero ( I think that's what you're trying to do). Think about it this way; if the trace is ##0## regardless of charge distribution then the (entire) integrand (after you have summed) has to be categorically ##0##.

Long and short of it: bring the sum inside the integral.

Don't prove the integral is zero by integrating each term.

Prove the integral is zero by proving the integrand is zero.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lambda96
Thank you PhDeezNutz for your help 👍

Do you mean the following?

$$=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{3} \int_{}^{}d^3x'(3{x'^2}_i-{r'}^2) p(x’)$$
$$=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{3} \int_{}^{}d^3x'(3{x'^2}_i-{x'^2}_1-{x'^2}_2-{x'^2}_3) p(x’)$$
$$=\int_{}^{}d^3x'(\sum\limits_{i=1}^{3} 3{x'^2}_i-{x'^2}_1-{x'^2}_2-{x'^2}_3) p(x’)$$
$$=\int_{}^{}d^3x'(3{x'^2}_1-{x'^2}_1-{x'^2}_2-{x'^2}_3+3{x'^2}_2-{x'^2}_1-{x'^2}_2-{x'^2}_3+3{x'^2}_3-{x'^2}_1-{x'^2}_2-{x'^2}_3) p(x’)$$
$$=\int_{}^{}d^3x'(3{x'^2}_1+3{x'^2}_2+3{x'^2}_3-3{x'^2}_1-3{x'^2}_2-3{x'^2}_3) p(x’)$$
$$=\int_{}^{}d^3x'0 p(x’)$$
$$=0$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz
More simply you change the order of summation and integration and then work on the summation to write $$\begin{align} & \sum\limits_{i=1}^{3} (3{x'^2}_i-{r'}^2)=\sum\limits_{i=1}^{3} (3{x'^2}_i)-\sum\limits_{i=1}^{3} ({r'}^2)\nonumber \\
& =3\sum\limits_{i=1}^{3} ({x'^2}_i)-({r'}^2)\sum\limits_{i=1}^{3}1=3({r'}^2)-({r'}^2)\times 3=0. \nonumber
\end{align}$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lambda96 and PhDeezNutz
  • #10
That’s exactly what I meant. Good Job.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lambda96 and kuruman
  • #11
Thank you kuruman and PhDeezNutz for your help 👍👍
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K