# Clarification on electric quadrupole moment definition

• user1139
In summary, there are two definitions of the electric quadrupole moment: $Q_{ij}=\frac{1}{2}\int \rho(\vec{x}')x'_i x'_j\,\mathrm{d}^3x'$ and $Q_{ij}=\int (3x'_i x'_j-\delta_{ij}x'^2)\rho(\vec{x}')\,\mathrm{d}^3x'$. The second definition is known as the "traceless" quadrupole moment and is obtained by expanding a potential in terms of spherical harmonics, while the first definition uses a different basis. It is important to keep the multipole moments consistent with the basis used to expand the Green's function
user1139
Homework Statement
Clarification on electric quadrupole moment definition
Relevant Equations
The equations are as given below
I have encountered two (?) definitions of the electric quadrupole moment. They are:

$$Q_{ij}=\frac{1}{2}\int \rho(\vec{x}')x'_i x'_j\,\mathrm{d}^3x'$$

and

$$Q_{ij}=\int (3x'_i x'_j-\delta_{ij}x'^2)\rho(\vec{x}')\,\mathrm{d}^3x'$$

I am trying to study radiation arising from the electric quadrupole. I am confused since sometimes the first definition is used while other times, the second. As such, which definition should be used and why?

These two definitions arise for different forms of the multipole expansion. The second expression (called the "traceless" quadrupole moment because it's trace is 0) is obtained by expanding a potential in terms of spherical harmonics. The first variant must use some basis other than spherical harmonics to expand the Green's function. Whatever the case may be, the only requirement is that you keep your multipole moments consistent with the basis in which you expand your Green's function. Just don't mix and match.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multipole_expansion

What are you using the quadrupole moment for? Is there a particular equation you pulled out of a book or paper? If so, folks might be able to tell you which definition to use.

Twigg said:
These two definitions arise for different forms of the multipole expansion. The second expression (called the "traceless" quadrupole moment because it's trace is 0) is obtained by expanding a potential in terms of spherical harmonics. The first variant must use some basis other than spherical harmonics to expand the Green's function. Whatever the case may be, the only requirement is that you keep your multipole moments consistent with the basis in which you expand your Green's function. Just don't mix and match.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multipole_expansion

What are you using the quadrupole moment for? Is there a particular equation you pulled out of a book or paper? If so, folks might be able to tell you which definition to use.
I am trying to find the radiation from 2 like charges rotating about the axis at the origin. It seems to me that both definitions were plausible, hence, I was wondering which one should I use.

I would stick to the traceless definition. I believe spherical harmonics have the symmetries that best fit your problem.

Twigg said:
I would stick to the traceless definition. I believe spherical harmonics have the symmetries that best fit your problem.
This is a silly question but, the electric quadrupole moment calculated from both are not the same. Will this become a problem or is it simply just a matter of the derivation taken?

They are different. You can't interchange them. It depends on how you're tackling the problem. I recommend using the usual multipole expansion in terms of spherical harmonics. See Jackson chapter 9 section 7 for an example (or Jackson chapter 4 section 1 for the electrostatic case which is much easier to wrap your head around before tackling radiation). This will outline where the traceless quadrupole moment comes from. I couldn't tell you how to derive the other definition, other than the obscure comment on wikipedia that it's used for the fast multipole method.

Edit: The electrostatic case is also covered in Griffiths chapter 4.

## 1. What is the definition of electric quadrupole moment?

The electric quadrupole moment is a measure of the distribution of electric charge within a system. It is defined as the second moment of the charge distribution, taking into account both the magnitude and the spatial distribution of the charges.

## 2. How is the electric quadrupole moment different from the electric dipole moment?

The electric dipole moment measures the separation of positive and negative charges within a system, while the electric quadrupole moment takes into account the distribution of charges in more than two dimensions. In other words, the electric dipole moment is a special case of the electric quadrupole moment.

## 3. What are some common applications of the electric quadrupole moment?

The electric quadrupole moment has many applications in physics and engineering. It is used to study the structure of molecules, atoms, and nuclei, as well as to understand the behavior of materials in electric fields. It also plays a role in technologies such as nuclear magnetic resonance imaging and mass spectrometry.

## 4. How is the electric quadrupole moment calculated?

The electric quadrupole moment is calculated by integrating the charge distribution over the volume of the system. This can be done using mathematical equations or through experimental measurements.

## 5. Can the electric quadrupole moment be negative?

Yes, the electric quadrupole moment can be negative. This indicates that the charge distribution within the system is not symmetric, with more negative charge concentrated in one direction compared to the other. A positive electric quadrupole moment indicates a symmetric charge distribution.

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
997
Replies
1
Views
683
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
• Electromagnetism
Replies
3
Views
545
Replies
2
Views
828
• Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
1K
• Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
196
• Classical Physics
Replies
5
Views
2K