Musings, seeking opinions about the nature of time

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Kenwstr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nature Opinions Time
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the philosophical and scientific inquiries regarding the nature of time, initiated by a retired GIS analyst named Ken. He questions the measurement of time, its unidirectional flow, and the relationship between time and memory. A response emphasizes the importance of understanding Einstein's definition of time as what a clock measures, suggesting that deeper inquiries into time require a solid foundation in modern physics. The thread concludes with a note that broader philosophical questions are less welcome than focused scientific inquiries.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Einstein's theory of relativity
  • Familiarity with the concept of spacetime
  • Basic knowledge of modern physics principles
  • Awareness of philosophical implications of time
NEXT STEPS
  • Research Einstein's theory of relativity and its implications on time measurement
  • Explore the concept of spacetime and its role in modern physics
  • Investigate the philosophical perspectives on time and memory
  • Study the mathematical treatment of time in physics
USEFUL FOR

Philosophers, physicists, students of science, and anyone interested in the conceptual and scientific exploration of time.

Kenwstr
Messages
24
Reaction score
5
Hi,

Sorry, I had to pick a prefix but please feel free to reply as you see fit. I just joined to seek opinions on various things and hopefully learn some other things as well. I am a retired GIS analyst programmer. Completed 1st level multistrand science and maths in high school 1976 but didn't pursue that kind of science career. I have done some self-study in various areas over the years though. Anyway, I just wanted run a few things past more knowledgeable people for your opinions.

This may be a bit esoteric and weird. I was wondering, what is time exactly? So, far it seems no one has any real idea though we measure change as an indicator of time, we don’t measure time directly. Is that right? Also, it seems a mystery that time runs only forward and seem to run at a constant rate. Then I figured that we only perceive time in relation to memory. We have past memory and as we experience the present, create new memories. But what if time ran backwards, our future memories would be erased as we returned to past temporal memory states. So, at any point in time, we would only have past memories up to the present. That is, our perception would be the same as when time moves forward. Does this make sense? Would this not mean that we can only ever perceive time going forward whichever way or speed it ran? What if time ran at varying speeds, would not all physical function, memory, rotations, orbits, C and radioactive decay change speed to match time?Therefore, it seems to me that while we are in the space time stream, we have no idea what is actually going on in an absolute sense. Is the universe collapsing as time runs back for example? How could we possibly know?I suppose I am thinking in terms of whatever was before the big bang as a term of reference, was there even space time then? I guess nobody knows for sure but what do you suspect, could space time be generated out of that event and expanding with the energy field? That’s probably more than enough really big questions, especially that last one.Regards,

Ken
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It is very difficult to improve on Einstein's answer: Time is what a clock measures.

It's worth googling for this phrase (but be careful - google will serve up generous amounts of drivel along with the good stuff) to get an understanding of what Einstein meant and how it works with the mathematical (that is, the only unambiguous and complete) treatment of time in modern physics. It is also somewhat futile to take on the questions that you're asking here without that understanding.

Because of that futility this thread is closed. However, threads with more tightly focused questions based on modern physics will be welcome.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
510
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K