Must read books for aspiring Physicist

  • Thread starter Thread starter tasman2010
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books Physicist
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion highlights essential reading materials for aspiring physicists, emphasizing the importance of foundational texts. Recommended books include "Black Holes and Time Warps" by Kip Thorne, "The Feynman Lectures on Physics" by Richard Feynman, and "Introduction to Mechanics" by Kleppner. Participants express a preference for books that provide substantial understanding over those perceived as superficial, such as some works by Stephen Hawking and Brian Greene. The conversation also suggests that while some texts may be advanced, they can still be beneficial for motivated high school students.

PREREQUISITES
  • Basic understanding of physics concepts
  • Familiarity with algebra and trigonometry
  • Knowledge of calculus fundamentals
  • Interest in theoretical physics and its literature
NEXT STEPS
  • Read "Black Holes and Time Warps" by Kip Thorne
  • Explore "The Feynman Lectures on Physics" by Richard Feynman
  • Study "Introduction to Electromagnetism" by Griffiths
  • Investigate the works of George Gamow, particularly "Thirty Years that Shook Physics"
USEFUL FOR

High school students aspiring to study physics in college, educators seeking to recommend foundational texts, and anyone interested in deepening their understanding of theoretical physics.

tasman2010
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I am a Senior in high school and am looking to study physics in college. I have read a few Stephen hawkings books: Theory of Everything, Universe in a Nutshell, A Brief History of Time. I am reading The Elegant Universe and own Fabric of the Cosmos and The God Theory but haven't started them yet. Any other "must reads"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you must read "Blackholes and Time Warps" by Kip Thorne. It is an excellent book.
 
The Feynman Lectures is a pretty good read.
 
Qualitative:
You Must be Joking Mr. Feynman!
An Introduction to the Philosophy of Physics: Locality, Fields, Energy, and Mass
Black Holes and Time Warps

A little Quantitative(Algebra,Trigonometry, A little Calculus)
Physics for Scientists & Engineers-Tipler
The Feynman Lectures on Physics-Feynman?
Introduction to Mechanics-Kleppner

More Quantitative(Single Variable Calculus, Multivariate Calculus)
Mechanics-Goldstein
Introduction to Electromagnetism-Griffiths
 
  • Like
Likes Sadman Sakib
Pinu7 said:
More Quantitative(Single Variable Calculus, Multivariate Calculus)
Mechanics-Goldstein
Introduction to Electromagnetism-Griffiths

These books might be above his level right now.
 
thrill3rnit3 said:
These books might be above his level right now.

Which is why I put it under more quantitative. He could possibly study off them in a year or two.EDIT: Or now, depending how "aspiring" he is. A lot of high schoolers now are looking through higher than school-standard texts.
 
tasman2010 said:
I am a Senior in high school and am looking to study physics in college. I have read a few Stephen hawkings books: Theory of Everything, Universe in a Nutshell, A Brief History of Time. I am reading The Elegant Universe and own Fabric of the Cosmos and The God Theory but haven't started them yet. Any other "must reads"?

I myself don't enjoy Universe in a Nutshell by Hawking. His books are very pretty with the pictures, but I feel they stay so surface level, that you don't really get anything from them. That is my opinion though. I feel like if you read the books I list below, you will come out with something substantial and tangible, whereas Hawking just gives a bunch of eye and physics candy. I have never understood the stranglehold his books have. I have the same opinion of Brian Greene's books. Although I know he's very capable, he just strikes me as a car salesman who his selling a scientific theory, which has continued to bumble along for year after year, producing no real physics (in my opinion). String theory to my knowledge, has produced a ton of mathematics, but has no physical predictions that are correct and there isn't even a cohesive effort or theory. I think of it as sort of a popular fringe theory at this point, because although it may be useful in the future, I think there is better physics to be done right now.

The few books I recommend are:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0691125759/?tag=pfamazon01-20 by Richard Feynman
The best introduction to QED and quantum behavior out there, and it doesn't require higher mathematics.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0465023924/?tag=pfamazon01-20 by Richard Feynman
These six pieces are some of Feynman's more elementary material from his famous Lectures on Physics.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0486425630/?tag=pfamazon01-20 by George Gamow
A very good tour of the theories of gravity, from Newton to Einstein. Anything by Gamow is good, so look him up. He wrote Thirty Years that Shook Physics, which I've been wanting to read myself.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0880292512/?tag=pfamazon01-20 by Isaac Asimov
A lesser known book than Feynman's Lectures on Physics, this is from the author who wrote I, Robot, but this book is not fiction. It is a fantastic introduction to physics, all the way from mechanics, electricity and magnetism, to quantum physics. It does not require higher mathematics to read it.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/1400032954/?tag=pfamazon01-20 by James Gleick
You have to know some history to understand science, so why not start with the man who set modern day physics and mathematics into motion? This probably isn't the most comprehensive biography in terms information, but the story that Gleick presents is very readable and investigative.

Actually, the four authors above have written several books on physics and science, which are some of the best out there. Gleick wrote a great book on chaos, a biography of Feynman, Gamow wrote many books, including the fun Mr. Tompkins books, Asimov wrote a New Guide to Science (a huge tome on science), and Feynman of course has his books which are basically collections of stories throughout his life, both scientific and personal.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Surely you're joking Mr. Feynman (I know it was already said but I figured i'd just second it and give the correct title)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
Replies
15
Views
8K