My idea for a helium generator

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter OwainP
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Generator Helium Idea
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around a proposed helium generator utilizing radioactive decay, specifically alpha and beta radiation. The design includes an aluminum cylinder with two iron bars connected to power supplies, intended to enhance the interaction between alpha and beta particles to produce helium. However, participants concluded that while alpha emitters do produce helium, the quantity generated is insufficient for commercial viability. Additionally, the use of radioactive materials raises significant legal and safety concerns.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radioactive decay, specifically alpha and beta decay.
  • Knowledge of basic nuclear physics and particle interactions.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of half-life and its implications in radioactive materials.
  • Awareness of legal regulations surrounding the use of radioactive substances.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of radioactive decay and its applications in helium production.
  • Explore the commercial viability of helium-3 versus helium-4 in various industries.
  • Investigate the safety regulations and legal implications of handling radioactive materials.
  • Learn about alternative methods for helium extraction and production in the current market.
USEFUL FOR

Students interested in nuclear physics, researchers exploring alternative helium production methods, and professionals in the field of materials science or regulatory compliance regarding radioactive substances.

OwainP
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello. I am currently doing my GCSEs and I take Triple Science. My favourite science is definitely physics, and after a lesson on radioactive decay at school I came up with an idea. I remember a while ago hearing on the news that the Earth is running out of natural sources of helium.

My idea consists of an aluminium cylinder with a pipe in the top. At the bottom of the cylinder is a source of beta radiation, and at the top a source of alpha radiation. In the top half of the cylinder there is an iron bar passing through the whole diameter of the cylinder connected to a power supply (let's call this 'bar 1'), and an identical iron bar in the bottom half, also connected to a power supply (let's call this 'bar 2). The iron bars have copper wires wrapped around the ends (to create a magnetic field), and the current through bar 1 must be at least 8000x stronger than bar 2. The alpha particles will be directed by the magnetic field of bar 1 into the beta particles (which are directed by bar 2). The beta source should have a half life at least 2x smaller than the alpha source (as you need two beta particles with one alpha particle to create a helium atom). The helium will then rise out of the pipe at the top and can be stored in something. The magnetic fields created by the bars are not essential, but I thought that they would increase the yield by increasing the amount of beta particles hitting into alphas. Obviously the cylinder would have to be a vacuum to prevent the alpha/beta particles hitting anything else.

Please tell me if my idea would work, and if not why not - as I don't know too much beyond my GCSE physics and I would love to learn more. Thank-you for reading my post.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need those bars, or a beta source, or anything else. Every alpha emitter will produce helium, as the emitted nuclei will get stopped and catch two electrons (remember, the decayed atom has two too much afterwards anyway). The amount is not enough to be of commercial interest, however. Nature did that in natural gasoline resources for millions of years.
 
Plus, the authorities tend to frown on unauthorized folks getting hold of large amounts of radioactive material. It gives the neighbors the heebie-jeebies, to use the technical term.
 
mfb said:
The amount is not enough to be of commercial interest, however. Nature did that in natural gasoline resources for millions of years.


But it might be worth noting that the amount of He3 IS of commercial interest, or a least is was back when the US was still producing fissionable material for bombs. But then He3 is very, very expensive whereas He4 is -relatively speaking- stil quite cheap.
 
He3 is not produced in alpha decays ;). I assumed the question considered He4 only.
 
mfb said:
He3 is not produced in alpha decays ;). I assumed the question considered He4 only.

True. I should have been clearer. I just meant to say that there are indeed some fairly exotic -but neverthless useful- materials/gases that are (or at least used to be) produced on a commercial scale using fission (either in reactors or in accelarators).
However, He4 is not one of themo:)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K