Why is my W filament burning in my DIY electron gun project?

  • Context: Electronics 
  • Thread starter Thread starter emtae55
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Filament
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the failure of a DIY electron gun project due to the burning of a tungsten (W) filament. The filament was subjected to a vacuum of 11 kPa (approximately 83 Torr), which is insufficient for preventing oxidation. To avoid burning, the oxygen content in the vacuum chamber must be reduced to below the level of tungsten atoms in the filament, necessitating a vacuum of at least low milliTorr. The use of a getter material, such as magnesium or sodium, is recommended to consume residual oxygen in the chamber.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vacuum systems and pressure measurements (e.g., milliTorr, Torr)
  • Knowledge of tungsten properties and oxidation behavior
  • Familiarity with electron gun design and operation
  • Experience with getter materials and their applications in vacuum technology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of getter materials in vacuum systems
  • Learn about achieving low milliTorr vacuum levels for electron gun applications
  • Explore the oxidation process of tungsten and methods to mitigate it
  • Investigate advanced vacuum techniques for electron beam applications
USEFUL FOR

Electronics hobbyists, engineers designing electron guns, and researchers in vacuum technology will benefit from this discussion.

emtae55
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I made electron gun by myself with W filament, but the filament was burned :(
I'm in a project that make electron gun myself. I made acryl cylinder for the body and used W(tungsten) filament that using in real SEM. I made the body vaccum(about 11kPa), and applied voltage to the filament(about 6V). Then, the filament started to be heated. But problem was appeared. I didn't change the voltage and current, but the intensity of light of filament went increased by itself, and then it was burned and the electron gun was broken down.
How can i solve this problem??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The tungsten is burning with the oxygen still in the vacuum chamber.
 
256bits said:
The tungsten is burning with the oxygen still in the vacuum chamber.
But the air pressure of the chamber was 11kPa. Isn't it insufficient?
 
emtae55 said:
But the air pressure of the chamber was 11kPa. Isn't it insufficient?

No. That's about 83 Torr, barely rough vacuum. You need at least low milliTorr medium vacuum to high vacuum for a hot filament not to quickly burn.
https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/vacuum-d_837.html
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: 256bits and anorlunda
emtae55 said:
But the air pressure of the chamber was 11kPa. Isn't it insufficient?
No. Not for the small mass of the tungsten filament, which is somewhere of the order of micrograms in mass.

A gross calculation.
Knowing that:
1 g of tungsten has 5.44 x 10-3moles of atoms,
Atmospheric air has 2 x 10(exp -3 ) moles of atoms oxygen in one liter.
Oxidation of tungsten combines 1 to 1 ratio of oxygen with tungsten,

You have to reduce the oxygen content in your chamber to below that of the level of tungsten atoms in your filament.

With a filament of microgram mass, that is 1 millionth of atmospheric pressure ( density ), or milliTorr.
Which is in line with what is mentioned above.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nsaspook
IIRC, in the manufacture of vacuum tubes they use a sacrificial piece of some metal (magnesium, sodium?) that consumes the oxygen. I don't remember if it needs to be heated by an electric current.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nik_2213
Keith_McClary said:
IIRC, in the manufacture of vacuum tubes they use a sacrificial piece of some metal (magnesium, sodium?) that consumes the oxygen. I don't remember if it needs to be heated by an electric current.
In vacuum tubes, the 'Getter' as it is called, is heated as the final stage of evacuation. An overview can be found here:
https://vacaero.com/information-resources/vac-aero-training/1166-getter-materials.html
above found with:
https://www.google.com/search&q=getter+material+in+vacuum

Cheers,
Tom
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Nik_2213, dlgoff, Asymptotic and 1 other person

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K