N=2 Super Yang-Mills: Auxiliary Fields Question

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the construction of the Vector supermultiplet in N=2 Supersymmetry (SUSY) and its relationship to N=1 theories. Specifically, it addresses whether to include the two auxiliary fields from the N=1 theory (F from the Chiral and D from the Vector multiplets) or to utilize a single auxiliary field for off-shell degrees of freedom. The off-shell counting indicates that N=1 requires 2 bosonic degrees of freedom for the Chiral supermultiplet and 1 for the Vector, while N=2 necessitates 3 bosonic degrees of freedom for the Vector supermultiplet. The confusion arises when attempting to derive a Lagrangian for the N=2 Vector supermultiplet, which appears identical to that of the N=1 gauge theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of N=1 and N=2 Supersymmetry (SUSY)
  • Familiarity with supermultiplet structures in theoretical physics
  • Knowledge of auxiliary fields in supersymmetric theories
  • Basic principles of Lagrangian formulation in field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the construction of N=2 SUSY theories and their supermultiplet structures
  • Explore the role of auxiliary fields in N=1 and N=2 SUSY
  • Learn about off-shell degrees of freedom in supersymmetric models
  • Investigate the similarities and differences between N=1 and N=2 gauge theories
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, particularly those specializing in supersymmetry, field theory researchers, and graduate students exploring advanced topics in particle physics.

StuartY
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I was wondering since the Vector supermultiplet in N=2 SUSY can be built from a Chiral and a Vector supermultiplet from N=1, in order to make up the off-shell degrees of freedom, would you include the two auxiliary fields from the N=1 theory (traditionally F from the Chiral and D from the vector multiplets), or would you make them up using a single auxiliary field? I'm sorry if this was a terrible question or has been poorly worded.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not familiar with N=2 SYM, but what does your off-shell counting suggest?
 
Sorry for the late reply. So off-shell for N=1 requires 2 bosonic d.o.f. for the chiral superultiplet, and 1 for the vector. For N=2 the vector supermultiplet requires 3 bosonic d.o.f.. I've been looking at this some more, and I think I'm getting even more confused because when I try and write out a Lagrangian for the N=2 vector supermultiplet I get the same Lagrangian as for the N=1 gauge theory.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
23K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K