Hey all! Thanks for reading. I'm currently following along in some reading and had some trouble with re-writing a Hamiltonian in Bogluibov-de Gennes form using Nambu notation (Nambu spinors). Here is the low down:(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Say we have a Hamiltonian:

[tex] \frac{1}{2} \sum_{i=1}^{N} c_{i}^{\dagger} D c_{i} + \frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^{N-1}c^{\dagger}_{i+1}Tc_{i} + c^{\dagger}_{i}T^{\dagger}c_{i+1}

[/tex]

where we have

[tex] D = (\frac{\hbar^2}{ma^2} - \mu)\tau_{z} [/tex]

and

[tex] T = (-\frac{\hbar^2}{2ma^2}\tau_{z} - \frac{i\Delta}{2a}\tau_{x}) [/tex]

The tau are Pauli matrices. We are to be able to write the Hamiltonian as a 2Nx2N matrix (N being the number of particles), by defining Nambu spinors

[tex] \tilde{c} = (c_{1}, c_{2},...,c_{N})^T [/tex]

which is of length 2N since each c_{i} is a 2 spinor. Finally, we can simplify the Hamiltonian to

[tex] H = \frac{1}{2} \tilde{c^{\dagger}}H\tilde{c} [/tex]

Where H is a tridiagonal matrix consisting of T's and D's. I understand how the two are equivalent, but how could I just look at a Hamiltonian and tell if I could simplify it using Nambu spinors? When using the Bogluibov quasiparticles we see the same type of thing to get a BdG Hamiltonian. I can check the equivalence by working backwards, but how could I start with the original H in my statement and rearrange it to ultimately get the Nambu form? Hopefully I'm being clear enough :P

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A Nambu Spinor Notation in Kitaev spinless p-wave model

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

**Physics Forums | Science Articles, Homework Help, Discussion**