Hi guys, I wass recently thinking about the Anderson model in its non-interacting limit U=0. I ommit spin in the following and then the hamiltonian is(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]H_{0} + \varepsilon_{0}d^{\dagger}d + \sum_{k} V_{k}c_{k}^{\dagger}d + \text{h.c} [/tex]

It is well know that due to the hybridization term V, a resonance of width ~ V^2 happens in the density of states of the impurity site. But suppose this term

[tex] \sum_{k} V_{k}c_{k}^{\dagger}d + \text{h.c} [/tex]

is now changed to the term:

[tex] \sum_{k} V_{k}c_{k}^{\dagger}d^{\dagger} + \text{h.c} [/tex]

i.e., particle number is NOT conserved in this modified Anderson hamiltonian at U=0. Would we still observe a resonance peak at the impurity density of states? The physics of such term are a bit unclear to me since it does not represent an hybridization term properly speaking, Thanks!!

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# A Anderson model with no hybridization

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Anderson model hybridization | Date |
---|---|

A Susceptibilites for the Anderson Impurity Model | Feb 8, 2018 |

Weak Localization, Anderson Localization and disorder | Jan 3, 2014 |

What is the difference between Mott localization & Anderson loc.? | Jun 30, 2013 |

Help - Anderson localization | Nov 9, 2010 |

Anderson impurity model | Apr 30, 2010 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**