Name for integration by parts shortcut

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a shortcut for integration by parts, specifically involving the identification of constants \(\lambda\) and \(\mu\) such that \(f'' = \lambda f\) and \(g'' = \mu g\). This method is particularly effective for integrals involving exponential and trigonometric functions, allowing for simplification in cases like \(\int x \sin(x) dx\). Participants confirm that both \(\lambda\) and \(\mu\) are numerical constants, and the shortcut can yield results without traditional integration by parts, making it a valuable technique for solving common integrals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations, specifically second-order linear equations.
  • Familiarity with integration techniques, particularly integration by parts.
  • Knowledge of exponential and trigonometric functions.
  • Basic proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical expressions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the derivation and applications of the method of undetermined coefficients in differential equations.
  • Study advanced integration techniques, including integration by parts and reduction formulas.
  • Learn about the properties of exponential functions and their derivatives.
  • Investigate the use of Laplace transforms in solving differential equations.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and professionals seeking efficient methods for solving integrals, particularly those involving exponential and trigonometric functions.

PhantomOort
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi all. I've recently learned a shortcut for integration by parts, but don't know what it's called or where it comes from.

The trick is to find \lambda such that f'' = \lambda f and \mu such that g'' = \mu g, providing both are constants and \lambda\neq\mu. Then \intf(x)g(x)dx = \frac{f'g-fg'}{\lambda-\mu}.

Can anyone tell me what this is called? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is \lambda a number here? Then I can't imagine that "shortcut" being much good. It is only possible to find \lambda such that f"= \lambda f and g"= \lambda g when both f and g are linear combinations of e^{\lamba x} and e^{-\lambda x}.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes, both \lambda and \mu are numbers. Obviously this only works in cases where they exist, such as for exponentials, trig functions, or x. But these make up a great many common integrals, so it's a pretty good shortcut.
 
It does not seem to be a shortcut but rather like a nice exam question that my professors used to ask. I really liked it. Let me write it again, becaues latex parser went crazy above...

fg = (\lambda -\mu)\frac{fg}{\lambda -\mu} = \frac{f''g-fg''}{\lambda - \mu} = \frac{f''g-fg''+f'g' - f'g'}{\lambda - \mu} = \frac{(f'g)' -(fg')'}{\lambda - \mu}

Integration gives the result...
 
PhantomOort said:
Yes, both \lambda and \mu are numbers. Obviously this only works in cases where they exist, such as for exponentials, trig functions, or x. But these make up a great many common integrals, so it's a pretty good shortcut.
It would seem to me that integrals of the form \int(Ae^{\lambda x}+ Be^{-\lamba x})(Ce^{\lambda x}+ De^{-\lambda x}) dx= \int (ACe^{2\lambda x}+ BDe^{-2\lambda x}+ (BC+ AD))dx could be done directly without worrying about integration by parts.
 
trambolin said:
It does not seem to be a shortcut but rather like a nice exam question that my professors used to ask. I really liked it. Let me write it again, becaues latex parser went crazy above...

fg = (\lambda -\mu)\frac{fg}{\lambda -\mu} = \frac{f''g-fg''}{\lambda - \mu} = \frac{f''g-fg''+f'g' - f'g'}{\lambda - \mu} = \frac{(f'g)' -(fg')'}{\lambda - \mu}

Integration gives the result...
Damn, I could have done that! I need to stop being so lazy.

Thanks.
 
HallsofIvy said:
It would seem to me that integrals of the form \int(Ae^{\lambda x}+ Be^{-\lamba x})(Ce^{\lambda x}+ De^{-\lambda x}) dx= \int (ACe^{2\lambda x}+ BDe^{-2\lambda x}+ (BC+ AD))dx could be done directly without worrying about integration by parts.

It's for integrals like \int x sin(x) dx, which are usually done by parts. Not that this is super hard, but with the shortcut, \lambda=0, \mu = -1, and the result is sin(x)-xcos(x) and we're done.


PS, my apologies to any readers put off by the formatting. I'm utterly unfamiliar with this tex style and working through it as I go.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
613
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K