Naming Stars: A Scam or Legitimate Organization?

  • Thread starter Thread starter frankinstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stars
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the legitimacy of organizations that offer to name stars, the role of the International Astronomical Union (IAU) in naming celestial objects, and the implications of purchasing star naming certificates. Participants explore the historical context of star naming and express various opinions on the commercialization of star names.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the official organization responsible for naming stars, with one suggesting that the IAU is the governing body for celestial names.
  • Others argue that there is no single official namer of stars, as various catalogs and systems exist for naming stars based on brightness and historical significance.
  • Several participants express skepticism regarding companies that sell star naming certificates, labeling them as fraudulent or lacking legitimacy.
  • One participant humorously suggests starting a business selling pulsars, while others engage in speculative discussions about extraterrestrial life and the legality of capturing such beings.
  • Some participants emphasize that the IAU does not recognize the names given by commercial star naming companies, stating that these names are not official.
  • Concerns are raised about the ethical implications of selling star names and the motivations behind such purchases, with some viewing it as a romantic gesture and others as exploitation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the legitimacy of star naming organizations, with some asserting that they are scams while others acknowledge the romantic appeal of naming stars. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the ethical implications of purchasing star names.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference various star naming conventions and catalogs, highlighting the complexity of the naming process and the lack of a unified system. There are also discussions about the motivations behind buying star names and the perceived value of such purchases.

frankinstein
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
What organization is the official namer of stars?

The reason I ask is with all the new Earth sized planets being found and the eventual identification of those with at least water and perhaps signatures of life by spectral analysis, the planet first found as such, I believe at least, should be named "Bruno's Star" after Giordano Bruno who put forth the idea of extraterrestrial life in 1584.


Frank
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
frankinstein said:
What organization is the official namer of stars?
There isn't one.
The very brightest stars have historical (generaly Arabic)names, then the next systematic attempt was to name them after the constellation and greek letters in order of brightness. Then everybody creating a star catalog names (or rather numbers) the stars in their own scheme.

So Betelgeuse is also α Ori = brightest star in Orion, and:
HR 2061 = Yale Bright Star Catalogue
BD+7°1055 = Bonner Durchmusterung (bonn observatory)
HD 39801 = Henry Draper Catalogue
SAO 113271 = Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory Star Catalog
FK5 224 = Catalogue of Fundamental Stars 5th ed
HIP 27989 = Hipparcos Catalogue
 
Last edited:
The governing body which is responsible for the names of all celestial objects (stars, planets, galaxies, etc.) is the International Astronomical Union.

To my knowledge, newly discovered stars are never given proper names.

- Warren
 
Also, just to be pedantic, the Bayer designations for stars in Orion isn't completely based on brightness: Rigel is almost always brighter than Betelgeuse, but it's Beta Orionis. The belt is Delta, Epsilon and Zeta Orionis, even though Epsilon is the brightest and Delta the dimmest.
 
Well, what about these certificates where you can "buy" a star and give it as a gift. Is that bogus?
 
flatmaster said:
Well, what about these certificates where you can "buy" a star and give it as a gift. Is that bogus?
Um - yes. The International Astronomical Union is the organization that names celestial objects.

The certificates for start names are only valid for the buyer, the one giving the gift, and the one receiving the gift.
 
Great. I think I'll start selling pulsars.
 
flatmaster said:
Great. I think I'll start selling pulsars.


Regarding selling and extraterrestrial life..What if you could go to one of those stars. Legally you could, if their technology where vastly inferior to ours, capture them and sell them as pets! There's no law preventing it? Of course you'd have to innoculate them against any stuff that they could catch here, but as far as their stuff harming us? I guess you'd have to keep them in a jar, aquirium or something to isolate them?

I can just see the new Animal Planet show, "The Alien Whisper". LOL

Frank
 
  • #10
Nobody has the right to name star.
There are companies who are offering to attach names to stars while making the designations seem official, providing a fancy certificate and directions for locating the newly named point of light. It's not hard to grasp the romantic or otherwise wondrous reasons someone might have for buying a star name, especially as a gift. Pretty much nothing, beyond some very expensive paper.

Only the International Astronomical Union (IAU) has the right to officially name celestial objects. According to the IAU, apart from a limited number of bright stars with historic names, stars do not have proper names. Where historic names exist, these names are, with a few exceptions, taken from the Arabic language:

Also some stars are named after a person.

http://www.ichatscience.com/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
frankinstein said:
Regarding selling and extraterrestrial life..What if you could go to one of those stars. Legally you could, if their technology where vastly inferior to ours, capture them and sell them as pets! There's no law preventing it?

I sure hope there isn't. I like to think that people who would want to create such a law would not get voted into public office in the first place.
 
  • #12
Well, I don't see you can attach a name somewhere in the database while actually using the star's offical number name for all intents and purposes. Just more money for the sake of science. It's sort of like state education lotteries. Take a silly thing ignorant people want to spend their money on and use it for good.
 
  • #13
frankinstein said:
Regarding selling and extraterrestrial life..What if you could go to one of those stars. Legally you could, if their technology where vastly inferior to ours, capture them and sell them as pets! There's no law preventing it?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_law"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #14
flatmaster said:
Well, what about these certificates where you can "buy" a star and give it as a gift. Is that bogus?


In one word, yes!
 
  • #15
Waveform said:
In one word, yes!


They are nothing but evil frauds intended to take advantage of people's stupidity. They charge money for writing star names in a book. Well, I'd gladly write your name in a book and mail you a totally useless certificate for a tenth of the price they charge!
 
  • #16
ideasrule said:
They are nothing but evil frauds intended to take advantage of people's stupidity. They charge money for writing star names in a book. Well, I'd gladly write your name in a book and mail you a totally useless certificate for a tenth of the price they charge!
So, basically, you're evil and cheap.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 96 ·
4
Replies
96
Views
12K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 152 ·
6
Replies
152
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
744
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
9K