1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

NASA confirms ‘impossible’ thruster actually works

  1. Aug 2, 2014 #1
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 2, 2014 #2

    D H

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    These articles are all over the place the last couple of days. Yours appears to be a near carbon copy of an article at gizmodo, which in turn got their article from the Spanish gizmodo site, which in turn got their article from The UK Wired site. This would be better as a study in poor scientific journalism than a question about fringe science.

    Note very well: We don't discuss fringe science at this site.

    All of these articles are based on a recently presented conference paper: http://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20140006052. This is just a conference paper; we can reject it just on that basis. Conference papers do not count as peer reviewed scientific literature. What's worse, from the paper, emphasis mine,
    The authors couldn't reject the null hypothesis. This might we be just a null result, which is exactly what should be expected.

    Thread closed pending moderation.
    Last edited: Aug 2, 2014
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook