Navigating the Tensions in Ukraine: A Scientific Perspective

  • Thread starter Thread starter fresh_42
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the complexities and potential consequences of the ongoing tensions in Ukraine, drawing parallels to historical conflicts. Participants express concerns about the motivations behind Putin's actions, suggesting he aims to expand Russian influence and possibly recreate aspects of the Soviet Union. The effectiveness of Western sanctions is debated, with skepticism about their impact on halting Russian aggression. There are fears that if the West does not respond decisively, the situation could escalate beyond Ukraine, potentially affecting other regions like Taiwan. Overall, the conversation highlights the precarious nature of international relations and the risks of underestimating authoritarian ambitions.
  • #1,801
caz said:
News should not be confused with history.
Of course. And I didn't say it was history. But the result is obviously the (preliminary) conclusion, with sources present on the Wiki pages ("Ukrainian victory[1][2][3][4][5][6]"). Also, of course there could come a second Kyiv offensive and second Kyiv battle, but according to the sources I follow, this does not seem likely to happen soon at least.

I've also checked with e.g. the EuroMaidan Press:

Russo-Ukrainian war, day 38: Ukraine recaptures large swathes of terrain near Kyiv as Russia focuses on Ukraine’s east (EuroMaidan Press, 2022/04/02)
https://euromaidanpress.com/2022/04/02/russo-ukrainian-war-latest-news-april-2/
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #1,802
caz said:
While not trying to be pro-Russian/anti-Ukranian, I do not believe Wikipedia can make these determinations. While it might turn out to be true, we do not know what is going to happen tomorrow (literally). These things are determined after a suitable amount of time has past. News should not be confused with history.

I don't agree with this. I mean, Wikipedia does not get to make the determination of whether Ukraine won, but Ukraine and Russia do. All the evidence points to Ukraine winning this. If Russia comes back and takes Kyiv later, that would be a different battle.

How long after d-day do you think Wikipedia should wait to call it a successful beach landing?
 
  • Like
Likes DennisN
  • #1,803
Office_Shredder said:
I don't agree with this. I mean, Wikipedia does not get to make the determination of whether Ukraine won, but Ukraine and Russia do. All the evidence points to Ukraine winning this. If Russia comes back and takes Kyiv later, that would be a different battle.

How long after d-day do you think Wikipedia should wait to call it a successful beach landing?
I am not arguing with the facts, just the characterization.

So if in a couple of days the Russians turn around, are we going to be talking about the Second Battle of Kyiv and the Second Kyiv Campaign. I doubt it.

I would argue that “D-Day” “ended” when the Allies broke out. If in late June, early July the Germans had launched a counter offensive which forced Allied retreat, we would refer to it as a single action (the failed Operation Overlord).
 
Last edited:
  • #1,804
caz said:
I do not believe Wikipedia can make these determinations. While it might turn out to be true
In that case, there would be a First and Second Battles of Kiev. Like the Second Battle of Bull Run.
 
  • #1,805
Vanadium 50 said:
In that case, there would be a First and Second Battles of Kiev. Like the Second Battle of Bull Run.
The first battle was in July 1861. The second was in August 1862.
 
  • #1,806
wrobel said:
[...] It is time to pay the bills.
Maybe too soon, but, since we speak of "bills", has anyone attempted yet to estimate how many trillions of euros (or hryvnia?) worth of damage has been inflicted on Ukraine by Russia?
 
  • Like
Likes Klystron and PeroK
  • #1,807
strangerep said:
Maybe too soon, but, since we speak of "bills", has anyone attempted yet to estimate how many trillions of euros (or hryvnia?) worth of damage has been inflicted on Ukraine by Russia?
I am waiting for Ukraine to sue for the Russian funds ($300B) frozen in Western banks.
 
  • #1,808
strangerep said:
Maybe too soon, but, since we speak of "bills", has anyone attempted yet to estimate how many trillions of euros (or hryvnia?) worth of damage has been inflicted on Ukraine by Russia?
I do not know an exact amount. And yes for Russia it will be a bill to pay and it must be paid.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #1,809
strangerep said:
Maybe too soon, but, since we speak of "bills", has anyone attempted yet to estimate how many trillions of euros (or hryvnia?) worth of damage has been inflicted on Ukraine by Russia?
Or how many civilians killed or seriously injured.
 
  • Like
Likes Astronuc and pinball1970
  • #1,810
wrobel said:
I do not know an exact amount. And yes for Russia it will be a bill to pay and it must be paid.
And what enforcement mechanism do you imagine to make your "must" actually happen?
 
  • #1,811
Evidence of war crimes in the village of Bucha near Kyiv have been reported by BBC and Reuters. Dead bodies of civilians have been found in streets, including one man with his hands tied. At least 20 people were shot in the back of the head. The town has buried nearly 300 persons.
 
  • Sad
  • Wow
Likes DennisN, Klystron, pinball1970 and 2 others
  • #1,812
phinds said:
And what enforcement mechanism do you imagine to make your "must" actually happen?
I hope that Russia will go by German way.

By the way the property and money of the oligarchs in USA and EU can be given to Ukraine right now.
 
  • #1,813
Astronuc said:
Evidence of war crimes in the village of Bucha near Kyiv have been reported by BBC and Reuters. Dead bodies of civilians have been found in streets, including one man with his hands tied. At least 20 people were shot in the back of the head. The town has buried nearly 300 persons.
A flood of reports of rapes and murders by Russian troops now, reminiscent of the atrocities in the Yugoslav civil war.
 
  • Sad
Likes pinball1970 and PeroK
  • #1,814
wrobel said:
I hope that Russia will go by German way.
STAGGERING optimism.
 
  • #1,815
wrobel said:
By the way the property and money of the oligarchs in USA and EU can be given to Ukraine right now.
Doubtful. Freezing assets is one thing. Stealing them to give to someone else is a whole 'nother can of worms.
 
  • Like
Likes vela
  • #1,816
phinds said:
Doubtful. Freezing assets is one thing. Stealing them to give to someone else is a whole 'nother can of worms.
I would expect that there is a legal channel for confiscating the funds of the Russian government, but not private individuals, unless it can be determined that the private individuals acquired the funds by illicit means. Even so, even a legal procedure would be difficult.
 
  • Like
Likes phinds
  • #1,817
phinds said:
Doubtful. Freezing assets is one thing. Stealing them to give to someone else is a whole 'nother can of worms.
I don't think that's what @wrobel meant.
 
  • #1,818
Astronuc said:
I would expect that there is a legal channel for confiscating the funds of the Russian government, but not private individuals, unless it can be determined that the private individuals acquired the funds by illicit means. Even so, even a legal procedure would be difficult.
The UK government has sanctioned 7 "oligarchs":

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/...archs-targeted-in-estimated-15bn-sanction-hit
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #1,819
PeroK said:
I don't think that's what @wrobel meant.
I don't see how else to interpret his statement. How do you interpret it?
 
  • #1,820
phinds said:
I don't see how else to interpret his statement. How do you interpret it?
That in a righteous world that's where their fortunes would go.
 
  • #1,821
PeroK said:
That in a righteous world that's where their fortunes would go.
We don't live in a righteous world, we live in a world that is (sometimes) ruled by law. What he is suggesting would be illegal.
 
  • #1,822
phinds said:
We don't live in a righteous world, we live in a world that is (sometimes) ruled by law. What he is suggesting would be illegal.
I don't share your reverence for ill-gotten wealth.
 
  • #1,823
PeroK said:
I don't share your reverence for ill-gotten wealth.
The issue is the governments needs to prove that it was ill-gotten wealth. You really don't want to go down the road of "I don't like these guys, so let's just take their money."
 
  • Like
Likes artis
  • #1,824
Astronuc said:
but not private individuals, unless it can be determined that the private individuals acquired the funds by illicit means. Even so, even a legal procedure would be difficult.
Exactly, we do understand that the folks got their money in ill ways but how do you prove that in a court of law? Unless you can get into Russia and access every criminal paper trail there is I'd say close to zero chances to do it in a legal way.
vela said:
The issue is the governments needs to prove that it was ill-gotten wealth. You really don't want to go down the road of "I don't like these guys, so let's just take their money."
Exactly, I for one share no illusion as to the source of most of that money, but I can't prove it legally.
Taking someone's money without a legal justification would be a bad precedent for the western system where justice in a court of law is considered among the foundations of a civil society.

I don't think that the only way to win over a corrupt government is to employ the very means which are used by the very government you are trying to win.

Seizing assets without a clear and transparent legal documentation is exactly what is done in Russia to those that have dared to oppose Kremlin.
 
  • #1,827
vela said:
The issue is the governments needs to prove that it was ill-gotten wealth. You really don't want to go down the road of "I don't like these guys, so let's just take their money."
Far be it from me to try to shake your faith in the inalienable rights of the fabulously wealthy!

The people's flag is deepest red ...
 
  • #1,828
PeroK said:
I don't share your reverence for ill-gotten wealth.
I have ZERO reverence for ill-gotten wealth but I have great reverance for the rule of law. It has to be PROVEN that it was ill-gotten even though we are pretty damned sure it was. Are you indifferent to the rule of law?
 
  • Like
Likes artis and BillTre
  • #1,829
wrobel said:
I hope that Russia will go by German way.
seriously? Hitler deliberately took the whole country down with him, basically your stereotypical cult leader mass suicide - that is what you want for Russia? Personally I would vote for Putin to go the way of Mussolini or Quadafi
 
  • Like
Likes phinds
  • #1,830
phinds said:
I have ZERO reverence for ill-gotten wealth but I have great reverance for the rule of law.
In Russia it's against the law to contradict Putin. The laws are often made by those in power to oppress those with no power. Nelson Mandela was tried for treason. In the US it was the law to return escaped slaves to their rightful owners.

Whoever betrayed Anne Frank was acting as the law dictated. Those who hid her were breaking the law.

I could go on.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K