Need a free backup program for Windows

Click For Summary
For users seeking a free and user-friendly program for differential backups on Windows laptops, several options are discussed. "Karen's Replicator" is mentioned, though its current status is uncertain following the creator's passing. "FreeFileSync" is highlighted as a potential alternative, although there is limited familiarity with it. "Macrium Reflect Free" is noted for its effectiveness in performing differential and full backups, but it does not support incremental backups in its free version. The tool "robocopy" is also considered, but it lacks a graphical user interface and relies on command-line usage, which may not appeal to those preferring a simpler solution. Overall, the emphasis is on finding a straightforward program that allows for easy file comparison and backup without the need for encryption or complex command-line operations.
Doc Al
Mentor
Messages
45,579
Reaction score
2,440
I'm looking for a free (and simple to use!) program to do differential backups of my files on my Windows laptop. I don't want anything encrypted, just something that can compare files to the backup and add/subtract whatever's been changed.

Years ago, I used "Karen's Replicator". Not sure if that's been kept up to date (after Karen's death). I see something called FreeFileSync, but know nothing about it.

Suggestions?
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
I've been using Macrium Reflect Free (free version) for a while and so far, so good. The free version can only do differential (and of course full) and not incremental backups.
 
Is robocopy good enough?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Is robocopy good enough?
I want to avoid command-line backup methods. (I'm lazy!)
 
Well, you can schedule the task. Then there is no user interface, graphical or otherwise.
 
LLMs and AIs have a bad reputation at PF, and I share this opinion. I have seen too much nonsense they produced, and too many "independent researchers" who weren't so independent after all, since they used them. And then there is a simple question: If we had to check their results anyway, why would we use them in the first place? In fact, their use is forbidden by the rules. I tend to interpret the reason for this rule because nobody wants to talk to a machine via PF. Those who want to can...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 123 ·
5
Replies
123
Views
19K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K