Need a good analogy of finding life in the universe

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the search for extraterrestrial life and the implications of the Fermi Paradox, which questions why we have not yet encountered intelligent life despite the vastness of the universe. Participants explore various analogies, probabilities, and philosophical perspectives regarding the existence of life beyond Earth.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest analogies, such as a man lost at sea, to illustrate the difficulty of finding extraterrestrial life in a vast universe.
  • Others argue that the absence of contact does not necessarily imply the non-existence of intelligent life, proposing that intelligent life may be rare.
  • Several contributions highlight the immense scale of the universe and the limitations of current technology in detecting life, emphasizing that communication could take thousands of years.
  • Some participants discuss the probability of life existing elsewhere based on the vast number of planets and the tenacity of life, including extremophiles that thrive in diverse environments.
  • There are contrasting views on whether the lack of evidence for extraterrestrial life supports the idea that intelligent life is uncommon or if it simply reflects our limited exploration capabilities.
  • Religious perspectives are also mentioned, suggesting that a Creator could have intentionally placed life at a distance from humanity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no consensus on the existence of extraterrestrial life or the implications of the Fermi Paradox. Some agree on the vastness of the universe and the challenges of contact, while others maintain differing interpretations of the evidence and probabilities involved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the reliance on analogies that may not fully capture the complexities of the Fermi Paradox and the assumptions about the nature of life and intelligence in the universe.

  • #31
phyzguy said:
I understand what you are saying, but I just don't buy it. You say, "if you placed a cell phone next to that ant hill they would be incapable of fathoming what it was much less its function." Notice that you don't say that they wouldn't know it was there (because they would). To continue the analogy further, do we see anything lying around that we are incapable of fathoming? Do we see any mysterious structures that we have no idea what they are? The answer is no, everything that we see is quite explainable.

I think it must be the case that an alien race, no matter how advanced, would still be composed of matter and energy, and we would be able to perceive them and their constructs, even if we couldn't understand them. The only alternative I can see would be if this hypothetical alien race existed on a "higher plane" that we are incapable of perceiving, but this takes us out of the realm of science and into mysticism.

Even leaving the Ant Analogy off the table I feel that we would be hard pressed to notice another civilization if that race didn't knock on our front door. There are thousands of asteroids in our solar system that are unaccounted for, highlighting that fact was the rock that exploded over Russia. Until it hit our sky we had no idea it was there. On the larger scale we recently discovered a planet in Alpha Centuri. We have been watching the skies for a very long time and cosmically speaking it was right next door but we completely missed it until a few years ago, just confirming it in 2012.

If our astronomy was a lot more advanced or if NASA had the budget of a pharmaceutics company then I would be more inclined to agree with you that we would notice if life was out there. Unfortunately I think we have a long way to come before we can look at our sky and say with confidence that we have it all figured out.

Don
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #32
A meteorite with amino acids was only recently discovered...
and they are still having issues deciding if life [as we know it] exists or existed on Mars...

And who sayseven if we found life we'd even recognize it if different from our carbon based life forms??
 
  • #33
Naty1 said:
A meteorite with amino acids was only recently discovered...
and they are still having issues deciding if life [as we know it] exists or existed on Mars...

And who sayseven if we found life we'd even recognize it if different from our carbon based life forms??

If it's to become as complicated as us, I can't see how anything else would do.

Reading the wiki article it looks like carbon has some pretty unique characteristics with respect to electrons.


That said I hear you with respect to "even recognizing it". Just saw a "deep sea" type show that featured an Octopus. My Land those things are strange, and apparently as smart as my dog...in the realm of mimicry . Thought I was looking at a rock, then all of the sudden it turn into some weired animal and "swam" away.
 
  • #34
phyzguy said:
I agree that the number of stars and planets is huge. I also agree that life is tenacious and tends to spread to diverse environments. This is the basis of the Fermi paradox - if intelligent life is common, it should already have spread throughout the galaxy. However, you can't argue that the probability of intelligent life existing elsewhere is good because the number of planets is large, because you have no idea how small the probability of intelligent life developing is.

The fact that we (life) exist here on this planet Earth tells me that the probability of similar life existing elsewhere in this galaxy is very high. Seems like the more we know, the more we know how little we know, and I think we need to accept this in our thought process.
 
  • #35
I think it is a lot like the copernican principle. Our existence is statistically meaningless. A sample of one proves nothing. I suspect the fact we are here is highly significant and strongly suggests we are not alone. I do not, however, believe we have any realistic chance of 'communicating' with our fellow confused beings.
 
  • #36
Lower life forms would appear to be unable to spread beyond a single star.

not necessarily so. If amino acids can make it, what else??

I watched a tv program last night "Aliens'...a series with different topics...not all that interesting overall but they made some interesting comments:

DNA is now believed well suited to interstellar travel,
an advanced civilization might well go robotic themselves but with species 'intelligence',
Might be an advanced civilization would be more interested in our resources than humans,
If predators more intelligent than prey, might alien travelers be so determined?
 
  • #37
phyzguy said:
...To continue the analogy further, do we see anything lying around that we are incapable of fathoming? Do we see any mysterious structures that we have no idea what they are? The answer is no, everything that we see is quite explainable...

Dark matter, dark energy, graviton, Unifying theory...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
7K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 91 ·
4
Replies
91
Views
22K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K