Need good math methods for physics book

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around recommendations for mathematics methods textbooks suitable for physics students, particularly focusing on the appropriateness and rigor of specific titles such as "Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences" by Boas and works by Hassani. The scope includes theoretical and practical applications of mathematical methods in physics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant, a first-year physics graduate student, seeks recommendations for math methods books due to a lack of coursework in this area, specifically mentioning deficiencies in complex analysis and heat flow.
  • Another participant suggests that Boas is appropriate for quickly getting up to speed, noting its level of rigor and omission of proofs.
  • A different participant expresses a preference for Hassani's work over Boas, implying it is superior in some aspects.
  • A follow-up question asks whether Hassani's book is as rigorous as Boas, indicating a concern for the level of mathematical rigor.
  • One participant asserts that while Hassani is more rigorous, this does not necessarily equate to being more useful, supporting Boas as a sufficient option.
  • Further clarification is provided that there are two different books by Hassani, one being less rigorous and more accessible, while the other is described as more advanced and rigorous but still well-explained.
  • A suggestion is made to visit a library to evaluate which book might be preferred personally.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the rigor and utility of the textbooks discussed, with no clear consensus on which book is definitively better. Some participants favor Boas for its accessibility, while others advocate for Hassani's works for their explanations and rigor.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not fully defined what they mean by "rigor" or "usefulness," and the discussion lacks resolution on the best choice for a math methods textbook.

frogjg2003
Messages
263
Reaction score
0
I am a first year physics graduate student. I double majored in math and physics, so I wasn't required to take a math methods in physics course. Looking at the course that was offered at my undergraduate institution, the only topics it covered that I am only deficient in are complex analysis and heat flow.
The textbook for that course was Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences by Boas. Is that a good book? Are there other good math methods books out there as well.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think Boas is pitched at just the right level of rigor (or lack of it; she tends to omit proofs) for getting up to speed quickly.
 
Boas is a nice book, but in my opinion Hassani is much better..
 
Thank you. Is Hassani as (more) rigorous as Boas?
 
yes but more rigorous =/= more useful. boas is fine.
 
frogjg2003 said:
Thank you. Is Hassani as (more) rigorous as Boas?


Well, actually there are two "Hassani's"
There is "Mathematical Methods: For Students of Physics and Related Fields"
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0387095039/?tag=pfamazon01-20
this one is not very rigorous (same as Boas), but it has some very nice explanations.
It's my favorite math-methods book.

The other one is "Mathematical Physics, A Modern Introduction to its Foundations"
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0387985794/?tag=pfamazon01-20
more advanced and rigorous but still a very nice book

Just go to your library and see which one you like..
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
10K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K