What Type of Thrusters Are Best for a Lightweight Aerial Descent Platform?

Click For Summary
For a lightweight aerial descent platform capable of carrying 60-100kg, using quadcopter thrusters may not be efficient due to their power limitations. Instead, alternatives like a crane or a movable stage are suggested for smoother descent, as they can handle stability and power issues more effectively. The discussion emphasizes that thrusters are generally inefficient for this application. Additionally, a flagpole-like structure could provide stability without requiring significant lateral mobility. Overall, the focus is on finding a more efficient descent mechanism rather than relying solely on thrusters.
koustov
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
i need to design a light weight platform(capable of carrying 60-100kg weight) with some kind of thrusters so that it can go down smoothly through air from about 5-10m of height to ground level. can anyone tell me what kind of thrusters i should use??
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Sounds like a job for a quadcopter, using more powerful than usual motors.
 
What if i want to make it by adding thrusters only??
quadcopter for such heavy weights will not be that efficient.
 
Thrusters are one of the most inefficient things you can use.
Something like a crane would be perfect, a movable stage would be extremely efficient as well. You also avoid all stability issues, powering issues, wind issues and so on.
 
  • Like
Likes Danger
mfb said:
Something like a crane would be perfect, a movable stage would be extremely efficient as well. You also avoid all stability issues, powering issues, wind issues and so on.
For sure, if it doesn't need a lot of lateral mobility. In fact, the stablest system might be something like a flagpole.
 
My idea is that I want to use immerse Whitetail Antlers in a fishtank to measure their volumetric displacement (the Boone and Crockett system is the current record measurement standard to place in a juxtaposition with) I would use some sight glass plumbed into the side of the tank to get the change in height so that I can multiply by the tank cross-section. Simple Idea. But... Is there a simple mechanical way to amplify the height in the sight glass to increase measurement precision...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K