Need help about the magnetic field near an infinite current sheet

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the magnetic field near an infinite current sheet, specifically focusing on the application of Ampere's law to determine the magnetic field at a test point P. Participants are addressing a specific problem from a question, with some parts already solved while others remain unclear.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents their calculation for the magnetic field, which they believe is incorrect compared to a provided solution.
  • Another participant questions the absence of the y-coordinate for point P in the original post.
  • Several participants suggest using Ampere's law and describe the need for a rectangular path that includes all current planes to find the magnetic field.
  • There is a discussion about the correct application of Ampere's law, including the distinction between dot and cross products in calculations.
  • One participant expresses confusion about the clues provided and seeks clarification on their approach involving a cross product.
  • Another participant points out that the path used in the calculations must be clearly defined and questions the relevance of certain variables in the calculations.
  • A later reply corrects a previous statement about the application of Ampere's law, emphasizing the importance of the dot product and the constancy of the magnetic field in certain directions.
  • Participants discuss the implications of moving the path in relation to the current planes and how it affects the magnetic field calculations.
  • One participant summarizes their findings based on a diagram, asking for validation of their result.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the application of Ampere's law, and there is no consensus on the correctness of the calculations presented. Multiple competing views and approaches remain in the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight missing assumptions or unclear definitions in the problem setup, particularly regarding the coordinates and the path used in calculations. There are unresolved mathematical steps and uncertainties in the application of Ampere's law.

e0ne199
Messages
56
Reaction score
5
Homework Statement
hello everyone, i have a question about magnetic field from infinite current sheet...
Relevant Equations
the equation will be related with the application of Ampere's Law on current sheet
here is the question, don't mind about point (a) and (b) because i have solved them already...the main problem is the question on point (c) :

1614333324457.png


so far, what i have done is : H = 2.7*0.1-(1.4*0.15+1.3*0.25) = -0.265 az A/m which is the wrong answer compared to the solution provided from the question...any help is really appreciated, thanks before
 
Physics news on Phys.org
e0ne199 said:
what i have done is
I don't see the y-coordinate of ##P## in your version ?
 
Use Ampere's law ##\oint \vec H d \vec l = I## twice. Use a rectangular path (which have to be in the plane perpendicular to the current direction). The first one would have to include pieces of all three current planes; this would give you the field on both sides of the stack of planes. The second one would have to go through your test point P.
 
Henryk said:
Use Ampere's law ##\oint \vec H d \vec l = I## twice. Use a rectangular path (which have to be in the plane perpendicular to the current direction). The first one would have to include pieces of all three current planes; this would give you the field on both sides of the stack of planes. The second one would have to go through your test point P.

sorry for the late response, but do you know how to apply your solution to my problem? probably i still have a little understanding for this kind of question...please help
 
BvU said:
I don't see the y-coordinate of ##P## in your version ?
could you please point out which is wrong on my current answer?
 
hallo, anyone?
 
e0ne199 said:
could you please point out which is wrong on my current answer?
Did you read the replies ?
e0ne199 said:
hallo, anyone?
Instant service required after two weeks of silence? Still nice to hear back from you :wink:
e0ne199 said:
the equation will be related with the application of Ampere's Law

what i have done is : H = 2.7*0.1-(1.4*0.15+1.3*0.25) = -0.265 az A/m
Yes, Ampere's law. As @Henryk wrote. It involves a path (maybe even several paths). Where is your path ? Is P on that path ?
 
BvU said:
Did you read the replies ?
Instant service required after two weeks of silence? Still nice to hear back from you :wink:
Yes, Ampere's law. As @Henryk wrote. It involves a path (maybe even several paths). Where is your path ? Is P on that path ?
i am sorry, i really don't understand about your clue...i did try to find another example for a whole week after posting that question here... the possible way i could think of is like this :

(2.7-1.4) X ay = 1.3 az A/m but i am not sure if the way i get the answer is right or not...
 
e0ne199 said:
really don't understand about your clue
But do you understand what I am asking ? Ampere <--> path . Where is your path ?

e0ne199 said:
(2.7-1.4) X ay = 1.3 az A/m
What is X ? What are you doing here and how is it related to Ampere's law ?
 
  • #10
BvU said:
But do you understand what I am asking ? Ampere <--> path . Where is your path ?

What is X ? What are you doing here and how is it related to Ampere's law ?
Screenshot_20210309-060736_LectureNotes.jpg


ok, here is the path, P is the green one, and pink line is the path.

about this
(2.7-1.4) X ay = 1.3 az A/m

i was doing a calculation with cross product, but i am not sure if this is the right way to do, since

H=K X an

so please tell me if i am doing it wrong or not
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20210309-060736_LectureNotes.jpg
    Screenshot_20210309-060736_LectureNotes.jpg
    74.7 KB · Views: 177
  • #11
oops, sorry, I have a symbol missing in Ampere's law, it should be ##\oint \vec H \cdot \vec l = I##, i.e. dot product, not cross product and I is the total current enclosed by the loop with the direction given by the right hand rule.
Now, you notice that you can move vertical vectors left or right (i.e. changing the length of the horizontal vectors, portions of the path) and as long as they don't cross current planes, the enclosed current remains the same. This tells you ##H_y = 0##. Similarily, the loop can be moved up or down and, since the current density is constant, the ##H_z = const##
Now, consider the two loops, ABCD and FBCE and you should get the correct answer.
 

Attachments

  • planes.png
    planes.png
    8.5 KB · Views: 185
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU
  • #12
@e0ne199 : Isn't it wonderful what a clear picture can do !
 
  • #13
Henryk said:
oops, sorry, I have a symbol missing in Ampere's law, it should be ##\oint \vec H \cdot \vec l = I##, i.e. dot product, not cross product and I is the total current enclosed by the loop with the direction given by the right hand rule.
Now, you notice that you can move vertical vectors left or right (i.e. changing the length of the horizontal vectors, portions of the path) and as long as they don't cross current planes, the enclosed current remains the same. This tells you ##H_y = 0##. Similarily, the loop can be moved up or down and, since the current density is constant, the ##H_z = const##
Now, consider the two loops, ABCD and FBCE and you should get the correct answer.
based on the diagram, the result is like this :

##H_z * l = K * l##
##H_z =##(loop ABCD)+(loop FBCE) = (2.7-1.4-1.3) + (-1.3) = -1.3 ##a_z## A/m

is that result correct?
 
  • #14
umm.. hello, anyone?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K