Using Ampere's Law for these two different integration paths

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the application of Ampere's Law in two distinct scenarios involving magnetic fields. In situation A, the absence of enclosed currents means Ampere's Law cannot be applied directly, and the magnetic field must be calculated using the formula B = μI/2πr with vector addition. In situation B, while Ampere's Law can be invoked, the contribution of external conductors complicates the calculation, necessitating the use of the principle of superposition and potentially numerical methods for accurate results. The moderator emphasizes that Ampere's Law is most effective in symmetric situations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Ampere's Law and its applications
  • Familiarity with the Biot-Savart Law for magnetic field calculations
  • Knowledge of vector addition in the context of magnetic fields
  • Basic principles of magnetic field symmetry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the Biot-Savart Law for complex current configurations
  • Learn about numerical methods for calculating magnetic fields in non-symmetric situations
  • Explore advanced topics in electromagnetism, focusing on magnetic field superposition
  • Review case studies where Ampere's Law is effectively applied in symmetric systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching electromagnetism, and engineers working with magnetic field calculations will benefit from this discussion.

WannaLearnPhysics
Messages
4
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement:: The magnetic field at every point on the path of integration
Relevant Equations:: The scenarios/situations are shown in the attached photo.

"Any conductors present that are not enclosed by a particular path may still contribute to the value of B field at every point, but the line integrals of their fields around the path are zero" This is the statement from Young and Freedman's University Physics with Modern Physics.

For situation A, I'm thinking that since no currents are enclosed, we can't really use Ampere's law to know the magnetic field at a certain point on the dotted circle. In this case (suppose that the conductors are very long, and straight), we should use B = μI/2πr and do vector addition. This means that the magnetic field at every point on the dotted circle is not the same. I'm sure about this, but I just want to verify if I'm correct.

My real problem is situation B. If I use ampere's law then that means that the magnetic field at every point on the path (dotted circle) is just B=μI(encl)/2πr. I don't think this is correct because just like the statement above, conductors not enclosed by the path may still contribute to the value of B. I'm thinking that this is similar to situation A wherein the magnetic field at every point on the dotted circle is not the same (considering the currents outside the circle and their distances to a certain point), which means I should follow the principle of superposition of magnetic fields.Additional question. Can I say "consider the conductors to be really heavy" to imply that they stay in place or that their distances to the points on the circle remain constant?

[Moderator's note: Moved to a technical forum since the questions are about general understanding..]
 

Attachments

  • ampere's law.png
    ampere's law.png
    10.7 KB · Views: 203
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Ampere's law applies for any closed path, regardless of the shape of the path and whether or not it encloses conductors. However, it is only useful to calculate the B-field when you can use the symmetry of the problem to see (for example) that the B-field is constant along the path you have chosen. When there is no symmetry, like in the pictures you have uploaded, I don't see any way to use Ampere's law to calculate the B-field. In cases like these, you typically have to use numerical codes to calculate the B-field by numerically carrying out the Biot-Savart law integrals.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WannaLearnPhysics, nasu and etotheipi

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
955
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
973