Need help finding exponential matrix e^AT

  • Thread starter Thread starter bengaltiger14
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exponential Matrix
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the matrix exponential e^AT for the given matrix A=[-2 0 0; 4 -2 0; 1 0 -2]. The original poster has identified the eigenvalues as -2, -2, -2 and is exploring how to handle the situation with identical eigenvalues.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the potential to split the matrix A into commuting parts to simplify the computation of the matrix exponential. There are questions about the method of splitting and whether to use eigenvectors.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring different approaches to compute e^AT, including the use of eigenvalues and matrix splitting. Some guidance has been offered regarding the properties of commuting matrices and the nilpotent nature of certain parts of the matrix. There is a focus on ensuring the correct application of matrix exponential definitions.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the requirements of the homework, particularly whether to use eigenvectors or alternative methods for finding the matrix exponential. The discussion includes attempts to clarify the definitions and properties of the matrices involved.

bengaltiger14
Messages
135
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Given the matrix: A=[-2 0 0;4 -2 0;1 0 -2], find e^AT.

I found the eigenvalues to be -2,-2,-2.

How do I solve this problem with 3 identical eigenvalues? Do I cube to matrix after plugging in my eigenvalue -2 and then solve it that way?

After plugging in the eigenvalue -2, the resulting matrix is: [0 0 0;4 0 0;1 0 0]

I could eliminate the 1 from row 3,col 1 and end up with two free variables. I am unsure after this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you can split the matrix A=B+C in such a way that B and C commute (i.e. BC=CB) then you can use e^A=e^B*e^C. Can you figure out how to do this in such a way that e^B and e^C are easy to compute?
 
splitting the original matrix or the matrix with the -2 eigenvalue?
 
bengaltiger14 said:
splitting the original matrix or the matrix with the -2 eigenvalue?

The original matrix. If you can split it into easy commuting parts, you don't need the eigenvectors.
 
I think my prof. wants us to use the Eigenvectors, but i do not know how to split it the way you are talking of.
 
Do it the easy way first. Split it into a diagonal part and an off-diagonal part. Do they commute? The off-diagonal part is nilpotent, it's easy to find both exponentials.
 
I am not sure how to split as you are talking. But the diagonal would just be a diagonal of e^-2t? And everything else just 0?
 
Yes, the exponential of the diagonal part (call it B) is the diagonal matrix with entries e^(-2). 'Everything else' is the matrix C=[0,0,0;4,0,0;-2,0,0]. e^C isn't 0. What is it? Notice that C^2=0 and put it into the series definition of the matrix exponential.
 
e^C would be: C=[0,0,0;e^4t,0,0;e^-2t,0,0]
 
  • #10
bengaltiger14 said:
e^C would be: C=[0,0,0;e^4t,0,0;e^-2t,0,0]

Not at ALL. e^C=I+C+C^2/2!+C^3/3!+... Isn't it? And don't forget before you can say e^(B+C)=e^B*e^C you HAVE to show B and C commute.
 
  • #11
So, the resulting matrix would be: [e^-2t,0,0;4e^-2t,e^-2t,0;e^-2t,0,e^-2t]

Does this look right?
 
  • #12
bengaltiger14 said:
So, the resulting matrix would be: [e^-2t,0,0;4e^-2t,e^-2t,0;e^-2t,0,e^-2t]

Does this look right?

No, not yet. Concentrate on e^(Ct) first. It's I+Ct+(Ct)^2/2!+... What is that? I just noticed that t floating around. You'll have to add it to some of my previous posts.
 
  • #13
That is: [1,0,0;4t,1,0;1t,0,1]

The e^C*eB = [e^-2t,0,0;4te^-2t,e^-2t,0;te^-2t,0,e^-2t]
 
  • #14
bengaltiger14 said:
That is: [1,0,0;4t,1,0;1t,0,1]

The e^C*eB = [e^-2t,0,0;4te^-2t,e^-2t,0;te^-2t,0,e^-2t]

That looks much better. You did check B and C commute, right? It's necessary.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K