Need help on this projectile motion problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves projectile motion, specifically analyzing the trajectory of a cannonball fired from a cliff at an angle of 20 degrees above the horizontal. The cannonball remains airborne for 3.5 seconds and travels a horizontal distance of 80.0 m before hitting the valley floor.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss breaking down the initial velocity into its x- and y-components and express concerns about the relative sizes of these components. Some participants suggest reconsidering the significance of certain time intervals in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering hints and prompting the original poster to rethink certain assumptions. There is a focus on understanding the relationship between horizontal and vertical components of motion, as well as the implications of the given angle.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the relevance of the time interval of 1.75 seconds, with participants indicating that it does not hold significance in the context of the projectile motion being analyzed.

LuckyIam
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A cannonball is fired from the top of a sheer cliff that towers over the valley fllor below. The angle of the initial velocity is 20 degrees above the horizontal. The cannonball remains in the air for 3.50 seconds before hitting its target on the valley floor, a distance of 80.0 m from the base of the cliff.

a) find the x- and y- components of the initial velocity of the cannonball
b) how high is the cliff?[/B]

Homework Equations


Vx = v0x + axt
x = x0 + v0xt + 1/2axt2
v0x = vcos(20)
v0y = vsin(20)[/B]

The Attempt at a Solution


Every time I attempt to break down the velocity into its components I end up with a v0y that's larger than v0x, which doesn't seem right at this angle.

X component:

x/t = Vi ---------> 80m/3.5s = Vicos(20) --------> 22.857/cos(20) = Vi = 24.32 m/s

Y component: for 't' at 1.75

Vf - (g)(t) = Vi -------> 0 - (-9.8)(1.75s) = Visin(20) ----------->17.15/sin(20) = Vi = 50.14 m/s

Any help would be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have not looked at your math, just at your wording about why you are concerned with what you got. Think about this: what is the initial horizontal competent of the object's velocity? What is the final horizontal component of the object's velocity? Think about the same thing for the vertical component (start and finish). Then think about this: does the height of the building have any effect on the horizontal component? How about vertical component?
 
A hint...

You know that the cannonball has been flying for 3,5 seconds. And, in that time, it has covered -horizontally- a distance of 80 m.

The horizontal component of the cannonball's movement is uniform, where v = e/t. Now, you can find that horizontal component of the velocity; from that component, knowing the angle, the initial velocity of the cannonball and its vertical component can be calculated, and...
 
NTW said:
A hint...

You know that the cannonball has been flying for 3,5 seconds. And, in that time, it has covered -horizontally- a distance of 80 m.

The horizontal component of the cannonball's movement is uniform, where v = e/t. Now, you can find that horizontal component of the velocity; from that component, knowing the angle, the initial velocity of the cannonball and its vertical component can be calculated, and...
I've found the components..I want to know if they're right. It seems like the initial Vy component shouldn't be a greater value than the Vx component
 
Right. You might want to rethink that 1.75 That is, why do you even think 1.75 has any particular meaning in this problem?
 
LuckyIam said:
I've found the components..I want to know if they're right. It seems like the initial Vy component shouldn't be a greater value than the Vx component

Right... The vertical component in much smaller than the horizontal component. Not a surprise, since the angle with the horizontal is quite small...
 
phinds said:
Right. You might want to rethink that 1.75 That is, why do you even think 1.75 has any particular meaning in this problem?
Because I was trying to calculate the velocity of Vy initial from its max height point which is at half of total time in the air. I've since learned that that's not the correct of way doing it, but I'm still a little confused about how to relate each component to 20 degrees above the X axis
 
I think you should write 2 equations : x=x0+v0xt+1/2at^2 and y= y0+v0yt-1/2gt^2. Because this is projectile motion, along x-axis acceleration is 0 and you can substitute t=3.5 and x=80 into x equation=> v0x
from this you can find v0 by v0x=v0cos20=> find v0y
 
LuckyIam said:
Because I was trying to calculate the velocity of Vy initial from its max height point which is at half of total time in the air. I've since learned that that's not the correct of way doing it, but I'm still a little confused about how to relate each component to 20 degrees above the X axis
Don't get confused, and try not to get lost with the equations...

Think...!

You have the time of the cannonball's flight, 3,5 s, and you know the horizontal distance covered (80 m) Remember that that horizontal motion is uniform, and hence the equation applicable is v = e/t. Thus, v = 80/3,5 => v= 23 m/s. That's the horizontal component.

Now you should draw the velocity vector, with its horizontal and vertical components. You already know the angle with the horizontal (20º). Now go ahead and determine the vertical component, It's not difficult. Just try...
 
  • #10
LuckyIam said:
Because I was trying to calculate the velocity of Vy initial from its max height point which is at half of total time in the air. I've since learned that that's not the correct of way doing it, but I'm still a little confused about how to relate each component to 20 degrees above the X axis

You've learned that this is not the correct way of doing it, or you've learned that 1.75 is NOT the half-way point, which is what I was getting at? 1.75 has absolutely no significance to this problem. That's what I was trying to help you understand.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K