Need help proving a limit using epsilon delta definition.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the limit of the function √x as x approaches a, specifically using the epsilon-delta definition of limits, under the condition that a > 0.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss manipulating the expression |√x - √a| and relate it to |x - a| through algebraic techniques. There are attempts to express delta in terms of epsilon and to establish inequalities that connect these variables. Some participants express confusion about the steps taken and seek clarification on the reasoning behind certain manipulations.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, sharing their progress and setbacks. Some have received guidance on how to approach the epsilon-delta definition, while others are still grappling with understanding the implications of their manipulations and the overall proof structure. There is a mix of interpretations and approaches being explored.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of issues with LaTeX formatting, which may affect clarity in presenting mathematical expressions. Additionally, participants are considering the implications of choosing specific values for delta and epsilon, and how these choices impact the proof.

nickadams
Messages
182
Reaction score
0
Need help proving lim(x)->(a) sqrt(x)=sqrt(a) using epsilon delta definition.

Homework Statement



Prove that the limit of \sqrt{x} is \sqrt{a} as x approaches a
if a>0

Homework Equations




in words

By the epsilon delta definition we know that the distance between f(x) and the limit of the function will be less than "epsilon" if x is within a certain distance "delta" of a.


in equation form

0<|x-a|<delta
|f(x)-L|<epsilon

The Attempt at a Solution



ok i got messed up with the latex and i don't know how to fix it.

But what I did was multiplied |sqrt(x)-sqrt(a)| by |sqrt(x)+sqrt(a)| over itself to get the top in a form similar to delta. So that comes out to |x-a|/|sqrt(x)+sqrt(a)| is less than epsilon.

so we have |x-a| in both the epsilon and delta inequalities, so is it safe to write delta in terms of epsilon? I don't know what to do now...
?




i'm stuck
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ok i got messed up with the latex and i don't know how to fix it.

But what I did was multiplied |sqrt(x)-sqrt(a)| by |sqrt(x)+sqrt(a)| over itself to get the top in a form similar to delta. So that comes out to |x-a|/|sqrt(x)+sqrt(a)| is less than epsilon.

so we have |x-a| in both the epsilon and delta inequalities, so is it safe to write delta in terms of epsilon? I don't know what to do now...
 
Prove that the limit of √x as x approaches a is √a
if a>0


please help...
 
Let's fix the Latex problem.
nickadams said:
...

The Attempt at a Solution



0<|x-a|<\delta
|\sqrt{x}-\sqrt{a}|<\epsilon

using (a-b)(a+b)=(a^{2}-b^{2}) the above epsilon inequality is changed to...

\frac{|x-a|}{|\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{a}|}&lt;\epsilon

now |x-a| is present in both the \epsilon and \delta equations so...?
I fixed the following, too.
|\delta|<\epsilon\cdot|\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{a}|

?

i'm stuck
 
Thank you so much SammyS!

I have made further progress since I last posted and I may be coming to a solution. I will post what I have soon and hopefully I can get the latex right this time.
 
Ok, I got stuck again. Here is what I have...

0<|x-a|< delta
|\sqrt{x}-\sqrt{a}| < epsilon

multiply |\sqrt{x}-\sqrt{a}|
by
|\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{a}| over itself
to get
|x-a|/\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{a} < epsilon

Now we need to find a constant C such that
|x-a|/\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{a} < |x-a|/C < epsilon

Since we want |x-a|, (AKA "delta") to be a pretty small number, we will choose it to be <1

in order for |x-a|/C to be > than |x-a|/\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{a}, C must be smaller than |\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{a}|

for the next step we will set up the inequality
|x-a|< 1
and try to rearrange it in a way where we can discover what the constant C (which is < than |\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{a}|) could be set equal to to assist in solving the problem.

solving |x-a|< 1 in terms of x gives us
x < a\pm1

so since we can set up this inequality
C < |\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{a}| < |sqrt{a\pm1}+sqrt{a}

but now i am stuck. Where have I gone wrong?
 
You want |\sqrt{x}- \sqrt{a}|&lt;\epsilon. Do NOT "multiply by \sqrt{x}+ \sqrt{a} over itself". Instead, multiply both sides by \sqrt{x}+ \sqrt{a} (which is obviously positive) to get |x- a|&lt; \epsilon(\sqrt{x}+ \sqrt{a}). Since \sqrt{x} is positive, \sqrt{a}&lt; \sqrt{x}+ \sqrt{a} and \epsilon\sqrt{a}&lt; \epsilon(\sqrt{x}+ \sqrt{a}). You can take \delta= \epsilon\sqrt{a}. That way, if |x- a|&lt; \delta= \epsilon\sqrt{a} you must also have |x- a|&lt; \epsilon(\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{a}).
 
HallsofIvy said:
You want |\sqrt{x}- \sqrt{a}|&lt;\epsilon. Do NOT "multiply by \sqrt{x}+ \sqrt{a} over itself". Instead, multiply both sides by \sqrt{x}+ \sqrt{a} (which is obviously positive) to get |x- a|&lt; \epsilon(\sqrt{x}+ \sqrt{a}). Since \sqrt{x} is positive, \sqrt{a}&lt; \sqrt{x}+ \sqrt{a} and \epsilon\sqrt{a}&lt; \epsilon(\sqrt{x}+ \sqrt{a}). You can take \delta= \epsilon\sqrt{a}. That way, if |x- a|&lt; \delta= \epsilon\sqrt{a} you must also have |x- a|&lt; \epsilon(\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{a}).

Thanks HallsofIvy. Although I can see why every one of your statements is true, I don't understand how it proves the limit as x approaches a of \sqrt{x} is \sqrt{a}.

I just don't understand why you did any of the things that you did. :(
Could you (or someone else) maybe help me understand what we were trying to accomplish? I know the problem wants us to prove a limit using the epsilon delta definition of a limit, but I don't understand what that entails, and I certainly wouldn't have known what steps to take if you hadn't shown me...




Edit: Are we able to take \delta= \epsilon\sqrt{a} because we know that |x- a|&lt; \delta and |x- a|&lt; \epsilon(\sqrt{x}+ \sqrt{a}), and \epsilon\sqrt{a}&lt; \epsilon(\sqrt{x}+ \sqrt{a}), so since |x-a| is less than \delta and |x-a| and \epsilon\sqrt{a} are both less than \epsilon(\sqrt{x}+ \sqrt{a}), we are able to set \delta equal to \epsilon\sqrt{a}? But if \delta = \epsilon\sqrt{a}, wouldn't that mean that \epsilon\sqrt{a} > |x-a|? And how can we know that?
 
Last edited:
To prove that "\lim_{x\to a}f(x)= L" means to show that, given any \epsilon&gt; 0 there exist \delta&gt; 0 such that if |x- a|&lt;\delta then |f(x)- L|&lt; \epsilon.

The point of choosing \delta= \epsilon\sqrt{a} is that you can then work backwards from the way I showed before:
If |x- a|&lt; \epsilon\sqrt{a}&lt; \epsilon (\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{a})
then
\frac{|x- a|}{\sqrt{x}+ \sqrt{a}}&lt; \epsilon
\frac{|(\sqrt{x}-\sqrt{a})(\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{a})|}{\sqrt{x}+ \sqrt{a}}&lt; \epsilon
|\sqrt{x}- \sqrt{a}|&lt; \epsilon
 
  • #10
HallsofIvy said:
To prove that "\lim_{x\to a}f(x)= L" means to show that, given any \epsilon&gt; 0 there exist \delta&gt; 0 such that if |x- a|&lt;\delta then |f(x)- L|&lt; \epsilon.

The point of choosing \delta= \epsilon\sqrt{a} is that you can then work backwards from the way I showed before:
If |x- a|&lt; \epsilon\sqrt{a}&lt; \epsilon (\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{a})
then
\frac{|x- a|}{\sqrt{x}+ \sqrt{a}}&lt; \epsilon
\frac{|(\sqrt{x}-\sqrt{a})(\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{a})|}{\sqrt{x}+ \sqrt{a}}&lt; \epsilon
|\sqrt{x}- \sqrt{a}|&lt; \epsilon

Okay that makes sense too. But where do we go from there to prove that the limit of √x is √a as x approaches a if a>0?

Can I say: If we want to be within |\sqrt{x}- \sqrt{a}| of the limit of √x, then we must pick an x value that is within |x-a| of a (AKA delta). So the delta we choose will be equal to \epsilon *|\sqrt{x}- \sqrt{a}|...

now what?
 
Last edited:
  • #11
nickadams said:
Okay that makes sense too. But where do we go from there to prove that the limit of √x is √a as x approaches a if a>0?

Can I say: If we want to be within |\sqrt{x}- \sqrt{a}| of the limit of √x, then we must pick an x value that is within |x-a| of a (AKA delta). So the delta we choose will be equal to \epsilon *|\sqrt{x}- \sqrt{a}|...

now what?
What HallsofIvy gave you in post #7 is what is often done on "scratch-paper", working backwards from |f(x) - L| < ε to |x-a| < δε , where δε is some expression for δ which is (usually) based on ε .

In final version of the proof you reverse that backwards argument and clean up any rough spots.
In other words: Using the δε that you found, start with 0 < |x - a| < δε. Then reversing your backwards "scratch-paper" argument, eventually you should arrive at |f(x) - L| < ε .

In your case, HallsofIvy showed you that δε = ε∙√a should give you your desired result.​
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K