Need help proving MoI is negligible

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chiborino
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the moment of inertia (MoI) of a torsion spring and its axis is negligible compared to the masses involved in the experiment. The user seeks a method to validate this assumption without dismantling the apparatus. A suggested approach involves estimating the dimensions and density of the shaft to demonstrate that its MoI is insignificant relative to the masses (2, 3, and 4) contributing to the system's overall inertia. The total inertia formula provided is \(\frac{1}{12}(M_{rod}L^{2}+M_{cyl}[6r_{o}^2+6r_{i}^2+2h^2+24d^2])\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torsion springs and their mechanics
  • Familiarity with moment of inertia calculations
  • Knowledge of basic physics principles related to rotational motion
  • Ability to estimate physical dimensions and densities of materials
NEXT STEPS
  • Research methods for estimating moment of inertia for various shapes
  • Learn about the principles of torsional oscillation and its relation to spring constants
  • Explore experimental techniques for measuring physical properties without disassembly
  • Study the impact of mass distribution on rotational dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and researchers involved in experimental mechanics or materials science who need to validate assumptions in torsion spring experiments.

Chiborino
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I did an experiment to measure the spring constant of a torsion spring (lab set-up pictured here:
eckqbA5.png


I have no problems calculating anything, but in the calculations, we assumed the inertia of the spring and axis to be negligibly small and it worked nicely. In the lab report I need to be able to prove this claim but I have no idea how to do it without taking the entire apparatus apart and measuring everything, which I'm not allowed to do anyways.

How do I go about proving that only the masses (2, 3, and 4 in the picture) provide non-negligible contributions to the moment of inertia of the system?

In case it helps, the total inertia calculated is:
\frac{1}{12}(M_{rod}L^{2}+M_{cyl}[6r_{o}^2+6r_{i}^2+2h^2+24d^2]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My current idea is to use our data for the equation of motion of this thing without the masses so ONLY that negligible inertia is there and use our calculated spring constant and angular frequency to calculate what the inertia actually is. But using something we calculated by ignoring inertia to calculate the ignored inertia seems circular to me.
 
You should be able to show the MOI of the shaft is negligible by estimating its dimensions and density. You don't need to calculate it to 6 decimal places just to show it doesn't matter.

For the torsion spring, I guess the outer end is fixed so it doesn't rotate.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K