MHB Need help to reverse engineer a problem...........................

  • Thread starter Thread starter jayearl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engineer Reverse
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding a method to reverse engineer a large number, specifically 5,408,286,291, into three or four-digit factors. The user seeks a formula or process to achieve this, expressing difficulty with mathematical concepts and terminology. It is suggested that using a calculator or computer to factor the number is the most efficient approach, as manual calculations can be tedious. The user clarifies the need for specific digit-length factors that multiply to the given number, indicating a desire for a practical solution. Overall, the conversation highlights the challenges of factoring large numbers and the importance of computational tools in this process.
jayearl
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I hoping that someone may help me find a formula for this problem...

Starting with a specific, large-sum number (ex. 5,408,286,291),

find 4, three or four digit numbers that, when multiplied, will arrive at this large-sum number. It could
be 3 larger numbers or 4 smaller numbers. It doesn't matter really just as long as we arrive at the
final sum.

Since I'm not a math student, I'm hoping to find a formula that can accomplish this. I guess
this is basically doing multiplication backwards. I know it's probably a strange request but I figured
that someone on this forum would know now.

Thank you
Jayearl
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello, and welcome to MHB, jayearl!

I've moved your thread because this forum is a better fit for the topic of the thread.

Your best bet here is to use a calculator/computer to factor the number (doing so by hand could be very tedious), for example:

W|A - Factor 5,408,286,291

On that page, we find the prime factorization:

$$5,408,286,291=3^2\cdot61\cdot1049\cdot9391$$

So, if we wanted 4 factors, we could use:

$$5,408,286,291=9\cdot61\cdot1049\cdot9391$$

And if we wanted 3 factors:

$$5,408,286,291=549\cdot1049\cdot9391$$
 
Thank you for the assistance.
But I don't believe I explained myself well.
(again, I'm not a math-guy at all so I don't know where to start)

I would like to have 3 or 4 numbers (each with 3 or 4 digits) that, when multiplied, arrive at a specific sum.
ex. 469 X 102 X 309 X 910 = _______number that I first specify______ OR
2005 X 7311 X 3017 = _______number that I first specify_______

Everyday I'll start with a new 9-digit number. Then, I'll need to work backwards? to find the factors that arrive at this new, daily sum.

Is this more clear?
Thank you again for any assitance.
Jayearl
 
Just to clear up some terminology, when you multiply several numbers together you get a product, not a sum. A sum is the result of addition. :D

There is no easy method/formula for factoring large numbers in general...so the best method is to use a calculator/computer to run known efficient algorithms for spitting out the factorization.
 
I believe this is what I need to know how to do:
"so the best method is to use a calculator/computer to run known efficient algorithms for spitting out the factorization"

This is where I don't know what to do...I know even know what an algorithms is .. OR I would be willing to pay someone to figure this out for me.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top