(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

imgur link: http://i.imgur.com/8TOXi9t.png

I am comfortable with the need to multiply the polynomial in front of [itex]e^{2x}[/itex] by [itex]x^3[/itex], that makes perfect sense in terms of what the text has already said about how no term in the particular solution should duplicate a term in the complementary solution, and that itself is logical in terms of the linear independence of the solutions.

What I don't fully understand is the need to multiply the polynomials in front of the trig functions by [itex]x[/itex].

[itex](D+Ex)\cos{3x} + (F+Gx)\sin{3x}[/itex] already has non-duplicated terms in it, ie, [itex]Ex\cos{3x}[/itex] and [itex]Gx\sin{3x}[/itex].

Why wouldn't it be sufficient to simply use [itex](D+Ex)\cos{3x} + (F+Gx)\sin{3x}[/itex] and assume that D and F will be zero or else absorbed by linearity into the undetermined constant coefficients of the corresponding trig functions in the complementary solution?

I have of course tried this, and it turns out that indeed the [itex]x\cos{3x}[/itex] and [itex]x\sin{3x}[/itex] terms cancel out when substituted back into the original differential equation, which is

imgur link: http://i.imgur.com/FLRpzcr.png

I've subbed the trial solution [itex](D+Ex)\cos{3x} + (F+Gx)\sin{3x}[/itex] into [itex](D^2+9)y[/itex] (the factor in the diff eq that produces the trig components of the RHS), and I can see how in this instance the [itex]x\cos{3x}[/itex] and [itex]x\sin{3x}[/itex] terms cancel out, leaving no [itex]x\sin{3x}[/itex] term.

I have come to agree with the insufficiency of [itex](D+Ex)\cos{3x} + (F+Gx)\sin{3x}[/itex] in this particular case, but I don't know why or how this carries over to the general case.

Why wouldn't [itex](D+Ex)\cos{3x} + (F+Gx)\sin{3x}[/itex] generally be okay in the particular solution when no [itex]x\sin{3x}[/itex] or [itex]x\cos{3x}[/itex] terms appear in the complementary solution?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Need help understanding an aspect of undetermined coeff's

Loading...

Similar Threads - Need help understanding | Date |
---|---|

Help needed in understanding the author method of solving a DE | Jan 30, 2014 |

Need Help Understanding Shooting Method | Aug 20, 2012 |

DIfferential equation for understanding cosmological expansion - need help | Apr 8, 2011 |

I need some help understanding eulers method. | Nov 21, 2009 |

Need help understanding linear equations of higher order | Jul 30, 2009 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**