Need help understanding these true/false questions

  • Thread starter Thread starter IntegrateMe
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the interpretation of rainfall data recorded by two students using different meteorological instruments. Student1's data shows total rainfall values at specific hours, while Student2 provides the rate of rainfall at those hours. The first true/false question is deemed false because the rate of rainfall during the second hour cannot be assumed to be 0.7 inches per hour, as it is measured at t=1, not t=2. The second question is true, as the average rate of change indicates that rainfall slowed down initially and then sped up. The third question is false, as discrepancies in measurements do not necessarily imply that one instrument is incorrect.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus concepts such as derivatives and rates of change.
  • Familiarity with the interpretation of meteorological data.
  • Knowledge of average rate of change calculations.
  • Basic grasp of concavity and its implications on function behavior.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of derivatives in calculus, focusing on their application in real-world scenarios.
  • Learn how to calculate and interpret average rates of change in various contexts.
  • Investigate the principles of concavity and how they affect the behavior of functions.
  • Explore different meteorological instruments and their accuracy in measuring rainfall.
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, meteorologists analyzing rainfall data, and anyone interested in understanding the nuances of interpreting rates of change in real-world measurements.

IntegrateMe
Messages
214
Reaction score
1
Two students recorded rain data during a storm using different meteorological instruments. F(t) describes the total rainfall, in inches, t hours after the start of the storm.


Student1: F(0) = 0; F(1) = 0.3; F(2) = 0.5
Student2: F'(0) = 0.6; F'(1) = 0.7; F'(2) = 0.3

1. Assuming all data is correct, during the second hour of the storm, it was raining at a rate of 0.7 inches per hour.

The answer is false, but why isn't it true? Looking at student2's data, we see that F'(1) = 0.7, which essentially means that after the first hour of the storm (which would be during the second hour), rain was falling at 0.7 inches/hour, right?

2. Assuming all data is correct, during the first hour of the storm rainfall slowed down and later sped up.

The answer is true, but I don't really understand why. It seems to me like the rate at which rain is falling actually stays constant or even decreases during the first hour. Any thoughts?

3. Either student1's instrument or student2's instrument must be incorrect, because they give different values for F'(0) and F'(1).

I would think the answer is true, because the rate at which the rain is falling shouldn't be different with different measurements, but the answer is false. Is it because rainfall isn't something that can be measured accurately, so there's bound to be some differentiation between the two?

Thanks guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'll try #2:
IntegrateMe said:
2. Assuming all data is correct, during the first hour of the storm rainfall slowed down and later sped up.

The answer is true, but I don't really understand why. It seems to me like the rate at which rain is falling actually stays constant or even decreases during the first hour. Any thoughts?
During the first hour of the storm is between t = 0 and t = 1. Looking at the average rate of change between these times, we get
\frac{F(1) - F(0)}{1 - 0} = 0.3 \text{ in./hr.}
Since this is less than both F'(0) and F'(1), there must some values of t where F'(t) is less than 0.3 in./hr.; otherwise, the average rate of rainfall between t = 0 and t = 1 wouldn't be 0.3 in./hr.
 
Bump?
 
How can F'(2) be smaller than F'(1)?
 
If the function is increasing and concave down, I suppose.

Increasing at a decreasing rate...
 
IntegrateMe said:
Two students recorded rain data during a storm using different meteorological instruments. F(t) describes the total rainfall, in inches, t hours after the start of the storm.


Student1: F(0) = 0; F(1) = 0.3; F(2) = 0.5
Student2: F'(0) = 0.6; F'(1) = 0.7; F'(2) = 0.3

1. Assuming all data is correct, during the second hour of the storm, it was raining at a rate of 0.7 inches per hour.

The answer is false, but why isn't it true? Looking at student2's data, we see that F'(1) = 0.7, which essentially means that after the first hour of the storm (which would be during the second hour), rain was falling at 0.7 inches/hour, right?

BTW, ignore my previous post; I misread the OP, sorry.

Re #1: No, read carefully: F'(1) is the rate of change of the rain _at t=1_
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K