Need help with Finding absolute magnitude

  • Thread starter Thread starter Michael c17
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Absolute Magnitude
AI Thread Summary
To find the absolute magnitude (Mv) using the given period (P = 7), the relevant equation is Mv = -[2.76(log10(P) - 1.0)] - 4.16. The user is seeking assistance in evaluating this equation but lacks a suitable calculator. Forum members suggest using online calculators or smartphone apps that can handle logarithmic functions. It's clarified that the user needs to evaluate the expression rather than solve an equation. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the calculation process and available tools.
Michael c17
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Need to solve this equation
Relevant Equations
Mv = - [2.76 (log10(P) - 1.0)] - 4.16
P is = to 7 and I don't know how to get the absolute magnitude please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Michael c17 said:
Homework Statement:: Need to solve this equation
Relevant Equations:: Mv = - [2.76 (log10(P) - 1.0)] - 4.16

P is = to 7 and I don't know how to get the absolute magnitude please help.
Please post the whole question as given to you. Define any variables that would only be obvious to someone versed in astronomy.
The "relevant equations " section is for standard equations, not any that only relate to the given problem. Maybe that is a standard equation.. I don't know.

And, per forum rules, please show some attempt, or at least provide your thinking so far.
 
I don't understand what your saying, there is the equation and 7 is P I just need someone to plug it in and give me Mv since I don't have a calculator that can do that. Sorry I'm not versed in your forum rules. I'm just trying to find the absolute magnitude of a star using only the period in days which is 7.
 
Michael c17 said:
I just need someone to plug it in and give me Mv
That's a key piece of information right there, that Mv (##M_v##?) is one variable, not two.
You confused me by saying you needed to solve the equation. What you are asking for is merely to evaluate an expression.

I find it hard to believe there exists any calculator that cannot do this. Just google online calculator and you will find several.
If you mean that you cannot do the whole expression in one hit, just do it in stages.
 
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics
@Michael c17, have you a smart-phone? My (low-end) phone has a calculator which includes 'advanced options' with log₁₀, brackets, trig' functions, etc. Check yours if you have one.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top