Need hint regarding Euler's constant question

  • Thread starter Thread starter librastar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves demonstrating that Euler's constant, denoted as γ, lies between 0 and 1. The original poster references a limit definition of γ involving the harmonic series and the natural logarithm.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster considers proving by contradiction, examining the implications of assuming γ equals 0 or is less than 0, and questions the validity of their logic. Other participants suggest using the squeeze theorem and Riemann sums as potential approaches to establish the properties of γ.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering hints and alternative methods without reaching a consensus. The discussion is productive, with various lines of reasoning being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the divergence of the harmonic series and the logarithm, which may influence the assumptions being examined. The original poster expresses uncertainty about their logical approach.

librastar
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that Euler's constant is 0 < [tex]\gamma[/tex] < 1

Homework Equations



According to my book, [tex]\gamma[/tex] = lim((1+1/2+...+1/n) - log n) as n approaches infinity

The Attempt at a Solution



At first glance I was thinking about proving by contradiction.

First I assume [tex]\gamma[/tex] is equal to 0.

Then I will get lim(1+1/2+...+1/n) = lim (log n) as n approaches infinity.

However 1+1/2+...+1/n is a harmonic series which diverges, so the equality does not hold.

So [tex]\gamma[/tex] does not equal 0.

Next I assume [tex]\gamma[/tex] is less than 0.

Since log function never yields negative result, this implies that lim(1+1/2+...+1/n) < lim(log n) as n approaches infinity.

Again due to the divergent nature of harmonic series, the inequality does not hold.

These are all I have for now.

=================================

I feel I have logic error in the attempt to solve the problem, and I hope that someone will give me a hint on the correct solution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Keep in mind that

[tex]\lim_{x\to a} [f(x)-g(x)]=\lim_{x\to a}f(x)-\lim_{x\to a}g(x)[/tex]

Is only true if both the limits on the RHS exist.

I haven't tried the problem yet, but you might consider using the squeeze theorem.
 
For proving the positivity of [tex]\gamma[/tex] you should think about Riemann sums
 
just to add to you first post, log(n) also diverges, so the harmonic argument doesn't quite hold
 
Office_Shredder said:
For proving the positivity of [tex]\gamma[/tex] you should think about Riemann sums

Same for showing it is less than 1. Very simple and nice when you see the idea.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
20K