Applied Need to buy mathmatical background books for grad course

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on selecting mathematical background books for a graduate course, with three recommended titles: "Mathematical Methods for Physicists" by Arfken, "Mathematical Methods in Chemistry and Physics" by Starzak, and "Mathematical Methods in the Physical Sciences" by Boas. Participants suggest that Arfken's book is well-structured but contains some typos, while Boas's book is considered more approachable for undergraduates. Additional recommendations include the Schaums Outline for its accessibility and affordability, and Prof. Kip Thorne's recently published book, which offers a geometric perspective. It's advised to check library availability and consider reviewing the books before purchasing, with a suggestion to opt for used copies of older editions if buying without prior examination. Overall, the importance of choosing the right mathematical resource for the course is emphasized.
oristo42
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
In the syllabus of the class, it recommended three mathematical background books:

Mathematical Methods for Physicists by Arfken

Mathematical Methods in Chemistry and Physics by Starzak.

Mathematical Methods in the physical sciences by Boas

I don't know difference between these three. Any recommendations?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
While its not on your list, the Schaums Outline: Mathematical Handbook of Formulas and Tables is a definite keeper.

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0071795375/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Its cheap at $10-$20 and is very accessible and comprehensive for applied math and quite useful in a physics context. I would get the paper version too not an ebook version as I've heard that the equations don't render correctly and often get messed up or that its just hard to read the formulas on the screen.

One other is Prof Nearing's book (free but seems to be offline perhaps affected by Irma):

http://www.physics.miami.edu/nearing/mathmethods/mathematical_methods-three.pdf

There is also a DOVER publication of the book:

https://www.amazon.com/dp/048648212X/?tag=pfamazon01-20

And lastly, Prof Kip Thorne's book (just published $120):

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0691159025/?tag=pfamazon01-20

and some more detail from Princeton Press:

http://press.princeton.edu/titles/10157.html

Of the books you mentioned, I like Arfken's book but I don't use it on a day to day basis and I did find a couple of typos in it that never seem to get fixed like every book seems to have. I've heard that Boaz's book is more approachable for undergrads but I felt the Arfken book laid out things structurally a little better.

For Thorne's book, I've seen preprints that were available online. He said in the preface that he was aiming for a more geometric view of the subject which might make it more accessible than either Arfken or Boaz. Also it will have a more physics based scope.
 
Are these available in your library? Your prof may have even placed them on reserve. If at all possible, look at the books before buying. You might not need/want any of them. If you do decide to buy without reading, i recommend you get cheap used copies of old editions.

Jason
 
  • Like
Likes CalcNerd
Im currently reading mathematics for physicists by Philippe Dennery and André Krzywicki, and I’m understanding most concepts however I think it would be better for me to get a book on complex analysis or calculus to better understand it so I’m not left looking at an equation for an hour trying to figure out what it means. So here comes the split, do I get a complex analysis book? Or a calculus book? I might be able to Borrow a calculus textbook from my math teacher study that for a bit and...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
538
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K