Need to calculate acceleration from total distance travelled.

In summary: Then do it again with u = 0 and v = vf. So you'll do two different calculations and get two different answers. You'll need to add them up to get the total distance traveled. 1. vf^2 = 0 + 2as 2. vf^2 = 0 + 2as 3. 15.8^2 - 7.9^2 / 2a = 23 4. a = 8.14 m/s^2 5. 15.8^2 - 0^2 / 2a = s 6. s = 124.64 m 7
  • #1
monac
20
0
Two objects move with initial velocity -7.9 m/s, final velocity 15.8 m/s, and constant accelerations.
(a) The first object has displacement 17.5 m. Find its acceleration.
Answer is 5.35 m/s^2 <-- I got this right.

(b) The second object travels a total distance of 23.0 m. Find its acceleration.
I am having trouble with this one.
So far I tried 8.14m/s^2 and 4.07 m/s^2. Webassign says it is wrong.
I don't know what I am doing wrong. :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
welcome to pf!

hi monac! welcome to pf! :wink:
monac said:
… So far I tried 8.14m/s^2 and 4.07 m/s^2.

show us how you got those, and then we can see where you've gone wrong :smile:
 
  • #3
a = change in v / change in t
t = 23m/7.9 m/s = 2.91 s <-- doesn't make sense because there are two different velocities so this approach is wrong.
a = 15.8 + 7.9 / 2.91 s
a = 8.14 m/s^2 d = v1+v2/2*t
23 = (15.8+-7.9)/2
solved for t
t = 5.82 s
plug this into vf = vi + at
15.8 + 7.9/ 5.82s
a = 4.07 m/s^2
 
  • #4
Thank you! I never used Physics Forums before, it is my first time.
 
  • #5
hi monac! :smile:
monac said:
t = 23m/7.9 m/s = 2.91 s <-- doesn't make sense because there are two different velocities so this approach is wrong.

correct! :smile: (ie, it is wrong! :redface:)

you need a constant acceleration equation with u v a and s (not u v a and t) …

if you don't know one, look up constant acceleration in the pf library or wikipedia :wink:
 
  • #6
When I plug into v^2 = u^2 + 2as
I am getting 4.07 m/s^2 again which is the wrong answer.
And that's the only equation without a t.
 
  • #7
monac said:
When I plug into v^2 = u^2 + 2as
I am getting 4.07 m/s^2 again which is the wrong answer.
And that's the only equation without a t.


hmm … yes, that's exactly the correct equation :smile:

it's also exactly the answer i get :confused:

(and just to check, it's 17.5/23.0 times the answer to the first part)

the book must be wrong :redface:

oh wait a mo …

does the question say "total distance" instead of "displacement", or is that just you? …

the total distance would be adding the negative to the positive, instead of subtracting :wink:

goodnight! :zzz:​
 
  • #8
It's the total distance not the displacement
That's why I am having trouble with this problem
What do you mean by

"total distance would be adding the negative to the positive, instead of subtracting"?
 
  • #9
try splitting part b into two parts, with zero velocity as the dividing point
 
  • #10
so you are saying v0 = 0 m/s
vf = 15.8 m/s ?
Then what would be delta x?
15.8^2 - 0^2 / 2*23?
Do you think that's right?
 
  • #11
hmm no wait, basically the 23 meters is divided into a distance traveled backwards and a distance traveled forwards. 23 meters is the total distance traveled, but what wikipedia wants is the displacement of the object.

when wikipedia uses s, it means x - x0, which is the displacement, that's not the value we're given, we're given the total distance traveled.

On wikipedia it also shows us that s = [itex]\frac{(u + v)t}{2}[/itex]

and this is the displacement for our situation, except we don't know the displacement, we only know the total distance traveled. So to get the total distance traveled, we pretend that our initial velocity is positive instead of negative.
 
  • #12
So I understand that our initial velocity should be positive, then ... what equation do I plug it into? all equations have a t in them ... which is unknown.
 
  • #13
but when s is total distance, it's not unknown, right?

total distance traveled = [itex]\frac{(|u| + |v|)t}{2}[/itex] basically
 
  • #14
so
2s/u+v t
2*23/7.9+15.8 = t
1.94 s = t

vf - vi / t = a
15.8 - 7.9 / 1.94 = a
a = 4.07 m/s^2 <-- That's the wrong answer I got in the first place :(
This is disappointing.
 
  • #15
well when you are no longer worried about the distinction between total distance traveled and displacement, then you no longer have the absolute value symbols there.
 
  • #16
SHISHKABOB said:
well when you are no longer worried about the distinction between total distance traveled and displacement, then you no longer have the absolute value symbols there.

You no longer have the absolute value symbols where? in the second part of my solution?
 
  • #17
if s = [itex]\frac{(u + v)t}{2}[/itex], then total distance traveled = [itex]\frac{(|u| + |v|)t}{2}[/itex]

but v = u + at is still valid, it's not |v| = |u| + at, since we aren't worried about making a distinction between total distance traveled
 
  • #18
(just got up :zzz:)

As SHISHKABOB :smile: says …
SHISHKABOB said:
hmm no wait, basically the 23 meters is divided into a distance traveled backwards and a distance traveled forwards. 23 meters is the total distance traveled, but what wikipedia wants is the displacement of the object.

… so you need to use three values of the speed instead of the usual two (in v2 = u2 + 2as) …

u = vi, v = 0, then u = 0 and v = vf,

and find separate values of |s| for the vi to 0 part, and for the 0 to vf part :wink:
 
  • #19
SHISHKABOB said:
if s = [itex]\frac{(u + v)t}{2}[/itex], then total distance traveled = [itex]\frac{(|u| + |v|)t}{2}[/itex]

but v = u + at is still valid, it's not |v| = |u| + at, since we aren't worried about making a distinction between total distance traveled

your process is still giving me 4.07 m/s^2 which is the wrong answer :(
 
  • #20
tiny-tim said:
(just got up :zzz:)

As SHISHKABOB :smile: says …


… so you need to use three values of the speed instead of the usual two (in v2 = u2 + 2as) …

u = vi, v = 0, then u = 0 and v = vf,

and find separate values of |s| for the vi to 0 part, and for the 0 to vf part :wink:

how do I get the s when I don't know the t?
 
  • #21
have you done it in two separate parts?

if so, what were your two results?
monac said:
how do I get the s when I don't know the t?

there isn't a t in v2 - u2 = 2as :confused:
 
  • #22
I am trying to find a ... what am I doing with the s ?
I am so close to giving up on this problem
 
  • #23
monac said:
I am trying to find a ... what am I doing with the s ?

the total s (or, to be precise, the total |s|) is given in the question

you should get two equations, with the same acceleration (an unknown, call it a), and with different distances (call them s1 and s2, also unknowns, except that you know what |s1| + |s2| is)
 
  • #24
monac said:
your process is still giving me 4.07 m/s^2 which is the wrong answer :(

that's not what I'm getting, I think you need to watch your signs, be careful about which numbers are negative/positive and if you're adding/subtracting them

again it's total distance traveled = [itex]\frac{(|u| + |v|)t}{2}[/itex]

and then v = u +at
 

1. How do I calculate acceleration from total distance travelled?

To calculate acceleration from total distance travelled, you will need to know the initial velocity, final velocity, and the time it took to travel the distance. The formula for acceleration is: acceleration = (final velocity - initial velocity) / time. Make sure to use the correct units for each variable (e.g. meters per second for velocity and seconds for time).

2. What is the difference between acceleration and velocity?

Acceleration is the rate at which velocity changes over time. Velocity is the rate of change of an object's position over time. Essentially, acceleration measures how quickly an object's speed or direction is changing, while velocity measures how fast an object is moving and in what direction.

3. Can acceleration be negative?

Yes, acceleration can be negative. This means that the object is decreasing in speed or changing direction in a negative direction. For example, a car slowing down as it approaches a red light would have a negative acceleration.

4. What is the unit of measurement for acceleration?

The unit of measurement for acceleration is meters per second squared (m/s²). This means that for every second an object is accelerating, its speed will increase by m/s. Other common units for acceleration include feet per second squared (ft/s²) and kilometers per hour squared (km/h²).

5. How is acceleration related to force?

Acceleration and force are directly related through Newton's second law of motion, which states that force = mass x acceleration. This means that the greater the force applied to an object, the greater its acceleration will be, and vice versa. In other words, forces cause objects to accelerate, whether positively or negatively.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
974
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
869
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
697
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
2
Replies
38
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
973
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
3
Replies
98
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
706
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
30
Views
2K
Back
Top