Needle and pressure (Bernoulli's equation?)

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving fluid dynamics, specifically applying Bernoulli's equation to a hypodermic syringe scenario. The original poster presents a situation where a force is applied to the plunger of a syringe, causing medicine to exit through a needle. The problem requires determining the speed of the medicine as it leaves the needle's tip.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between pressure and force applied to the plunger, with initial confusion about the correct force value. They explore how to apply Bernoulli's equation and the implications of different pressures at various points in the system. There are attempts to relate the velocities at the syringe barrel and needle using the area ratio, and questions arise about the assumptions made regarding pressure at the needle's exit.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing corrections and clarifications regarding the pressure calculations and the application of Bernoulli's equation. Some participants suggest using atmospheric pressure for the exit point, while others explore the implications of their calculations. There is a recognition of the need to clarify assumptions and definitions, particularly regarding the initial and final pressures in the system.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of atmospheric pressure in the calculations and the relationship between the areas of the syringe and needle. There is also mention of the lack of explicit consensus on certain assumptions, such as the initial velocity of the fluid and the treatment of pressure changes.

~christina~
Gold Member
Messages
714
Reaction score
0
[SOLVED] Needle and pressure (Bernoulli's equation?)

Homework Statement


A hypodermic syringe contains medicine having the density of water. Barrel has cross sectional area A= 2.50x10^-5 m^2 and the needle has a cross sectional area a= 1.00x10^-8 m^2. IN the absence of a force on the plunger the pressure everywhere is 1 atm.
A force of magnitude 2.00N acts on the plunger making medicine squirt from the needle. Determine the speed of the medicine as it leaves the needle's tip.

http://img123.imageshack.us/img123/1442/66319119wa1.th.jpg


Homework Equations


A1v1= A2v2

P_1 + 1/2 \rho v^2 + \rho gy_1 = P_2 + 1/2\rho v^2 + \rho g y_2

P= F/A


The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not sure how to get started but I'm thinking that if the plunger is pushed with a force of 20N then

P_1= 20.0N/ 2.50x10^-5m^2

P_1= 8e5 Pa

I was then thinking of plugging that into the Bernoulli's equation b/c it relates pressure however...I'm confused again...

using the bernoulli's equation... noting that no change in height

P_1 + 1/2 \rho v_1^2 = P_2 + 1/2 \rho v_2^2

v_1= (A_2/A_1) *v_2 => no v1 or v2...:frown:

I'm basically not sure since I do not have v1 or v2 but I do have P1...
P2 is different as is v2. v1 I was initially thinking it was at rest but then I thought it could not be since the plunger moved with force of 20N
Now I'm starting to think it relates to :

\Sum F= F_{plunger} - Fatm= ma => (where I can say P=F/A) but how can I do that if I don't have the m and not to mention I have no t or x so I wouldn't be able to use a as acceleration anyhow

I really would appreciate it if someone could help me out (especially with how to apply F to the equations to solve for v2)

Thanks a lot
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
~christina~ said:
I'm not sure how to get started but I'm thinking that if the plunger is pushed with a force of 20N then

P_1= 20.0N/ 2.50x10^-5m^2

P_1= 8e5 Pa
The plunger force was only 2 N, not 20 N. Also, the pressure due to the plunger force is in addition to atmospheric pressure.

I was then thinking of plugging that into the Bernoulli's equation b/c it relates pressure however...I'm confused again...

using the bernoulli's equation... noting that no change in height

P_1 + 1/2 \rho v_1^2 = P_2 + 1/2 \rho v_2^2

v_1= (A_2/A_1) *v_2 => no v1 or v2...:frown:
Since you know how v1 and v2 are related, you can write Bernoulli's equation with only one unknown variable. Everything else is known.

(Take advantage of the fact that A_2/A_1 << 1.)
 
Doc Al said:
The plunger force was only 2 N, not 20 N. Also, the pressure due to the plunger force is in addition to atmospheric pressure.

Oops...

P_1= 2.0N/ 2.50x10^-5m^2

P_1= 8e4 Pa

Hm...so then I guess I'd use this plus the atmospheric pressure and use that as P1
like so: P1= 8e4Pa+ 1.013x10^5Pa= 1.813e5


Since you know how v1 and v2 are related, you can write Bernoulli's equation with only one unknown variable. Everything else is known.

(Take advantage of the fact that A_2/A_1 << 1.)

okay so I would plug in for v1 since v1= (A2/A1)v2

What would I assume P2 to be though?

P_1 + 1/2 \rho v_1^2 + \rho gy_1= P_2 + 1/2 \rho v_2^2 = \rho gy_2

1.813e5 Pa + 1/2 \rho [(A2/A1)^2 v_2^2]= P_2 + 1/2\rho v_2

1.813e5 Pa + 1/2 \rho (1.6x10^{-7}) v_2^2= P_2 +1/2\rho v_2

But again...I'm stuck with what is P2?

Thank you :smile:
 
Since the needle end is still exposed to the atmosphere, P2 = atmospheric pressure.
 
I almost forgot about this Q.. well here's what I did.

Doc Al said:
Since the needle end is still exposed to the atmosphere, P2 = atmospheric pressure.

P_1= 2.0N/ 2.50x10^-5m^2

P_1= 8e4 Pa

Hm...so then I guess I'd use this plus the atmospheric pressure and use that as P1
like so: P1= 8e4Pa+ 1.013x10^5Pa= 1.813e5

okay so I would plug in for v1 since v1= (A2/A1)v2

P_1 + 1/2 \rho v_1^2 + \rho gy_1= P_2 + 1/2 \rho v_2^2 = \rho gy_2

1.813e5 Pa + 1/2 \rho [(A2/A1)^2 v_2^2]= P_2 + 1/2\rho v_2

1.813e5 Pa + 1/2 \rho (1.6x10^{-7}) v_2^2= P_2 +1/2\rho v_2

-----
now...using what you said: P2= atmospheric pres= 1.013x10^5 Pa

here's where I get stuck..

1.813e5 Pa + 1/2 \rho (1.6x10^{-7}) v_2^2= P_2 +1/2\rho v_2

1.813e5 Pa + 1/2 \rho (1.6x10^{-7}) v_2^2= 1.013x10^5Pa + 1/2\rho v_2

1.813e5 Pa -1.013x10^5Pa + 8e-5 v_2^2 - 500 v_2= 0

8e-5 v_2^2- 500v_2 + 8e4 = 0

Do I have to use the quadradic eqzn??

Well I was thinking of using this eqzn which is probably the same but rearranged I did this...

P_1-P_2 = 1/2 \rho (v_2^2-v_1^2) + \rho g(y2-y1)

1.813e5Pa- 1.013x10^5Pa = 1/2(1000kg/m^3)(v_2^2- (A2/A1)v_2)^2

8e4= 1/2(1000kg/m^3)v_2^2(1-(1.63e-7)^2)= 0

8e-4 = 500kg/m^3v_2^2(1)

160 = v_2^2

v_2= 12.649 m/s

hm..I'm not sure whether looks right but it looks funny somehow to me.

Is it incorrect?

Thanks very much Doc Al :smile:
 
~christina~ said:
I almost forgot about this Q.. well here's what I did.



P_1= 2.0N/ 2.50x10^-5m^2

P_1= 8e4 Pa

Hm...so then I guess I'd use this plus the atmospheric pressure and use that as P1
like so: P1= 8e4Pa+ 1.013x10^5Pa= 1.813e5

okay so I would plug in for v1 since v1= (A2/A1)v2

P_1 + 1/2 \rho v_1^2 + \rho gy_1= P_2 + 1/2 \rho v_2^2 = \rho gy_2

1.813e5 Pa + 1/2 \rho [(A2/A1)^2 v_2^2]= P_2 + 1/2\rho v_2

1.813e5 Pa + 1/2 \rho (1.6x10^{-7}) v_2^2= P_2 +1/2\rho v_2
You forgot the ^2 in that last term (which is what caused your later problems); that last equation should read:

1.813e5 Pa + 1/2 \rho (1.6x10^{-7}) v_2^2= P_2 +1/2\rho v_2^2

I would immediately compare the second terms on each side. I think we can safely ignore the second term on the left, since 1 \pm 10^{-7} \approx 1. :wink:

-----
now...using what you said: P2= atmospheric pres= 1.013x10^5 Pa

here's where I get stuck..

1.813e5 Pa + 1/2 \rho (1.6x10^{-7}) v_2^2= P_2 +1/2\rho v_2

1.813e5 Pa + 1/2 \rho (1.6x10^{-7}) v_2^2= 1.013x10^5Pa + 1/2\rho v_2

1.813e5 Pa -1.013x10^5Pa + 8e-5 v_2^2 - 500 v_2= 0

8e-5 v_2^2- 500v_2 + 8e4 = 0

Do I have to use the quadradic eqzn??
You took a wrong turn due to your earlier error.

Well I was thinking of using this eqzn which is probably the same but rearranged I did this...

P_1-P_2 = 1/2 \rho (v_2^2-v_1^2) + \rho g(y2-y1)

1.813e5Pa- 1.013x10^5Pa = 1/2(1000kg/m^3)(v_2^2- (A2/A1)v_2)^2

8e4= 1/2(1000kg/m^3)v_2^2(1-(1.63e-7)^2)= 0

8e-4 = 500kg/m^3v_2^2(1)

160 = v_2^2

v_2= 12.649 m/s

hm..I'm not sure whether looks right but it looks funny somehow to me.
Looks good to me. :smile:
 
Doc Al said:
You forgot the ^2 in that last term (which is what caused your later problems); that last equation should read:

1.813e5 Pa + 1/2 \rho (1.6x10^{-7}) v_2^2= P_2 +1/2\rho v_2^2

I would immediately compare the second terms on each side. I think we can safely ignore the second term on the left, since 1 \pm 10^{-7} \approx 1. :wink:

Hm so that's why it didn't work out right.

Looks good to me. :smile:


Thanks a lot Doc Al :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K