Needs clarity on this displacement vector diagram

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding a displacement vector diagram related to a river current and a boat's velocity. The vertical arrow beside NA represents the vertical component of displacement, which is confirmed to be 5 km. The label of 3 km is identified as a potential typo or an error from a different problem. The correct understanding of these components is crucial for accurately interpreting the displacement vector in the context of the problem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector components in physics
  • Familiarity with displacement and velocity concepts
  • Basic knowledge of diagram interpretation in physics problems
  • Ability to analyze and troubleshoot mathematical problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Review vector component analysis in physics
  • Study displacement vector diagrams in river current scenarios
  • Learn about common errors in physics problem diagrams
  • Practice solving problems involving velocity and displacement vectors
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching vector analysis, and anyone involved in solving problems related to displacement and velocity in fluid dynamics.

Chijioke
Messages
14
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
How far from his destination
Relevant Equations
The trigonometric ratios of acute angles in a right angled triangle:
SOH CAH TOA
IMG_20230831_042607.jpg

The problem is actually a solved example
IMG_20230901_042351.jpg

My attention is focused in understanding the displacement vector diagram as it has to deal with question (iv).
I have no problem understanding the velocity vector sketch below:
velocity vector.png


As you can see ND is the velocity of the river current due East and NE is the velocity of the boat supposed the man chooses to go Northward.
Here comes another sketch for the velocity
displacement vector original.png

I am confused about the sketch because
a. I don't understand what the vertical arrow beside NA meant.
b. the 3km, is what? Is the displacement of the river or what? If it is, how was obtained because I know from the wording of the problem nothing like that was given. what was given 3 kmhr-1, which the displacement of the river. From the solving as it in the book I thinking that the 5km
IMG_20230901_043519.jpg


As I showed here
displacement vector (1).png

Please help my understanding. Thank you.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20230901_042351.jpg
    IMG_20230901_042351.jpg
    43.8 KB · Views: 94
  • IMG_20230901_042351.jpg
    IMG_20230901_042351.jpg
    43.8 KB · Views: 86
  • IMG_20230901_043519.jpg
    IMG_20230901_043519.jpg
    15.6 KB · Views: 101
  • IMG_20230901_042351.jpg
    IMG_20230901_042351.jpg
    43.8 KB · Views: 102
Physics news on Phys.org
Chijioke said:
I am confused about the sketch because
a. I don't understand what the vertical arrow beside NA meant.
b. the 3km, is what? Is the displacement of the river or what? If it is, how was obtained because I know from the wording of the problem nothing like that was given. what was given 3 kmhr-1, which the displacement of the river. From the solving as it in the book I thinking that the 5km
You are understandably confused because the diagram provided in the solution is mislabeled. The vertical arrow beside NA must represent the vertical component of the displacement which is given as 5 km. The label 3 km is either a typo or the drawing is pasted from a different problem. Your drawing of the displacement vector is correct.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban and Chijioke
kuruman said:
You are understandably confused because the diagram provided in the solution is mislabeled. The vertical arrow beside NA must represent the vertical component of the displacement which is given as 5 km. The label 3 km is either a typo or the drawing is pasted from a different problem. Your drawing of the displacement vector is correct.
I may still have question concerning this but let go and think. Thank you.
 
Chijioke said:
I am confused about the sketch because
a. I don't understand what the vertical arrow beside NA meant.
The river can't be made narrower: the man still has 5 km separating him from the opposite shore.
It must be a typo.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Chijioke

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
8K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
993
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K